Tetedelacourse
New Member
- Location
- Rosyth
Tim Bennet. said:So Bomb Disposal should only be undertaken if peoples' lives were at risk? So if there is a terrorist bomb near your house you would expect them to evacuate the people and then just let it rip? If that's the case, this massive change in the public's expectation will make their jobs so mcuh easier. But it's sad then, that all the bomb disposal officers that lost their lives in Northern Ireland did so unnecessarily. They should have just let all those bombs explode. Once the people were out, it was only property at risk. .
I was commenting on the actions of this person, not the merits of bomb disposal generally. Two fire extinguishers into a bomb factory, after the fire service has pulled out does not equate to a sensible thing to do.
Tim Bennet. said:This change in expectation will also come as an enormous relief to the other rescue services. No more call outs to help with flood or storm damage and certainly no need to bother with tackling property fires if it means any risk to fire fighters. 'Let it burn - it's only property'..
Same applies here.
Tim Bennet. said:You only have to go to the US the see where this road has lead. The US Coastguard used to provide a rescue services at sea to anyone who needed it. Now they will only venture out if they believe a life is at risk. Everyone else has to make commercial arrangements for help. It's a system that some might think has merit but is totally at odds with the ethos in the rescue services here. It has also lead to a complete collapse of respect and support by the public for the USCG which has made the execution of their other functions so much harder..
Same here. I'm glad you mention respect - not something naturally given to such an act of stupidity. She was lucky and thankfully unhurt. Respect though? Nope.
Tim Bennet. said:The Covenant in this debate is relevant: Other posters were suggesting that there should be no compensation for anyone injured in the forces as they knew what they were getting into when they joined up. This idea is totally at odds with situation as has always existed since the days of Charles II.
Directed at those posts then I see the relevance, but not when directed towards the actions of the woman in the link.
Tim Bennet. said:We know very little about the circumstances of this situation. Based on knowing nothing I am at least prepared to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Based on what is described in the article, she was foolish but lucky, and I would be horrified if this sort of thing was to be encouraged by her employers or the public. Presenting an award for such actions seems wrong to me.