Andrew_Culture
Internet Marketing bod
- Location
- The People's Republic Of Suffolk.
even less wear then, as the skidding wheel ain't rubbing against the blocks
Good point!
even less wear then, as the skidding wheel ain't rubbing against the blocks
Might do but not IME; okay its not exhaustive but I've worn out 4 rims and they've all been rear. More muck etc collect on the rear wheel also that might also be a factorWeight transfer under braking negates that I think...
Might do but not IME; okay its not exhaustive but I've worn out 4 rims and they've all been rear. More muck etc collect on the rear wheel also that might also be a factor![]()
I have managed to wear out blocks in a single muddy CX race, so I do find that explanation fairly plausible...
Seems reasonable to me. Here are a couple of pics of my knockabout bike after a couple of recent mucky rides:Dirty rim's (or brake blocks) wearing the rim faster than a clean rim (or brake block) is a given, I just don't buy that the spray from the front wheel is dumping enough s*** on the back wheel to explain the wear rate differential between front and rear.
Even with the mudflap there is a surprising amount of spray that hits the cranks and my feet from the front wheel, so the back wheel will still be in a mist of water, mud and grit.Yes, I am well aware of where the muck ends up on a bike (I ride about 200 miles a week in the Cheshire lanes) but did it come from the front wheel?
Hardly anything coming off your front wheel with that flap will hit the back wheel, at least not much more than the back wheel will be picking up itself anyway.
Even with the mudflap there is a surprising amount of spray that hits the cranks and my feet from the front wheel, so the back wheel will still be in a mist of water, mud and grit.
I don't have any better explanation of why the rear wheel should get so much more muddy but am open to suggestions.