HLaB
Marie Attoinette Fan
I'm interested in some review of the Avio PM, its £250 and British made. http://cycling.avio.mobi/?page_id=2416
That's not an answer. It should work equally well in a group, in a headwind, in still conditions. How well that is, I don't know.Wind
That's not an answer. It should work equally well in a group, in a headwind, in still conditions. How well that is, I don't know.
That's still no answer. Why should it be an issue? Genuine question. Airflow is reduced and power requirement is reduced commensurately.Drafting someone in a group is the issue, so it is not going to work well in a group situation, for that reason.
It's not an issue. The power you produce ( cadence x torque ) can easily be kept constant, draught or no draught. The difference will be an increase in speed at the same power, with a draught.That's still no answer. Why should it be an issue? Genuine question. Airflow is reduced and power requirement is reduced commensurately.
That's still no answer. Why should it be an issue? Genuine question. Airflow is reduced and power requirement is reduced commensurately.
You don't seem to have understood how it works.Because the device relies on airflow to measure. If it isn't getting the airflow, it won't be measuring correctly.
I have one and use it across two bikes. Was a bit of a pain setting the two up but once done swap to and fro easily.A clubmate has one. It's like black magic to me but seems to work alright. I dont think changing it to different bikes is quite as straight forward as advertised though as he always seems to be doing calibration rides on strava!
You don't seem to have understood how it works.
I set mine up, temporarily, on my bike with a Stages PM and went for a group ride with my CC. Figures from both meters and head units were very very similar.That's not an answer. It should work equally well in a group, in a headwind, in still conditions. How well that is, I don't know.
It's an interesting conept that I've followed since the ibike incarnation. All power meters measure output indirectly, and use a model to estimate results, whether from strain gauges or the multiple factors this measures.
I'd consider one if I had any interest in my power output, but I don't. So I won't.
And, amazingly enough, the power requirement changes in these circumstances. So the measured airflow remains valid. Just as it would for a solo rider with a tailwind. Measuring changed airflow in changed circumstances and adjusting the estimated power accordingly is the whole point.There's very little not to understand. The device relies on changes in wind speed and air pressure to measure power - both of which will be affected if you are riding behind someone, or in a group.
And, amazingly enough, the power requirement changes in these circumstances. So the measured airflow remains valid.