Aesthetics vs functionality

[Snorrarcisco]

Functionality on your day to day bike seems to be the most important thing but how far does one go to have matching colours/accessories or in a certain way not matching anything at all?

I spotted some aero bottle and bottle cages from Elite that would look great, imo, on my Fuji although it is not an aero bike. The question is should I go for aesthetics or functionality? Aesthetics works well but I lose about 0.6l in comparison to two standard bottles.
Also I know its a personal thing but people do get a bit narky about others bikes. Not long ago I was told my black bar tape didnt go well with my green CX... although the stock tape is black and there is black on the bike...

 

[helston90]

Depends on the bike, the commuter is all about function, guards that work, lights that last, components that are heavier but stronger. My summer bike on the other hand only gets matching parts and beautiful things which I don't mind paying a bit more for.

 

[martint235]

Function all the way. Purists don't like me mixing SRAM levers with 105 calipers for example. But to me it's all about how it rides and whether or not I can complete the rides I want to do with it eg LEL

 

[Subotai72]

I like my bikes to look mint then I feel like riding them even more! But I suppose that is being rather shallow though!

 

[Milkfloat]

For me form follows function. If I have a choice between equal products then I will consider form, but generally function and price wins everytime.

 

[ianrauk]

It's what you like...not what anyone else thinks.

 

[ayceejay]

Is there some reason why you cannot have both?

 

[outlash]

Also I know its a personal thing but people do get a bit narky about others bikes. Not long ago I was told my black bar tape didnt go well with my green CX... although the stock tape is black and there is black on the bike...

If people are getting narky about how my bike looks then I'm not riding with the shallow twats.

 

[vickster]

Aesthetics as long as it all works

 

[steveindenmark]

Function for me every time.

 

[Mrs M]

It has to work but even better if it looks good too

 

[MichaelW2]

The old mistress vs wife dilemma. We've all been there mate.

 

[Pat "5mph"]

If it looks good but does not suit you, don't get it and shop about some more.
You'll find something you like eventually.

 

[BalkanExpress]

It's what you like...not what anyone else thinks.

 

[cyclistfriend]

As a cyclist enthusiast I consider aesthetics, functionality and cost. As I am someone heavily reliant on my bike for transport, functionality is definitely key to me. The topic of "aesthetics vs functionality" is highly dependent on the individual, which I guess is why we are all voicing our opinions. If you are interested in bikes beyond their practical use, I believe a balance between aesthetics and functionality must be achieved. The topic of "aesthetics vs functionality" is frequently under debate in 'architecture', and I am glad you have brought it to my attention.