wiggydiggy
Guru
That layout, with a straight-ahead bike lane and a left-turn mixed-traffic lane crossing each other, seems like a half-assed copy of an experimental layout in Cambridge on Hills Road at Cherry Hinton Road https://showmystreet.com/#v2mnz_2w4i_3z_o_-5k53 where probably some bean-counter refused to pay for the traffic islands needed to discourage drivers from ploughing straight through the bike lane.
Even so, I didn't think Cambridge built another one after that. Or at least I didn't until I found this almost-as-bad piece of shoot layout at the Science Park yesterday: https://showmystreet.com/#v3ifl_36y3_3m_o_-6k53 - to be fair, the lane starts centrally rather than swerving out from the kerb, but it's between lanes 2 and 3 when a cyclist may well be in lane 1 if they don't know the junction. At least it has an separated cycleway parallel behind the trees on the right, but it's not well signposted. A rare appearance of the "dual network problem"* in Cambridge hints that this is truly a crap cycle lane.
* - cyclists on the cycleway get narrow rough surfaces and few signs and often shouted at by walkers to use the road because the path is too busy, while cyclists on the carriageway get bonkers dangerous directions and often shouted at by drivers to get on the cycleway because the road is too busy. Almost no-one is happy with this except for the two extremes of would-rather-walk-than-ride-on-roads and loves-jousting-with-drivers.
The first one is not bad, at least it tries to offer some protection to cyclists. The second one though is awful, though I'm not sure what a good solution should look like.