But that's precisely my point, it's argued on here that leg strength is largely irrelevant to cycling, it's purely down to fitness.
well, as a woman, i would say i would love a bit more strength in my legs to get up the hills, my lungs are fine. i think it's all things combined, heart, lung and muscle capacity. i know when i'm cycling with my male friends that it's the strength in my legs that lets me down. take our Sunday morning rides, i always drop back on two of the hills and then i'm playing catch up until the next coffee stop. If it was flat all the way, no problem. Therefore, i reckon is down to pure muscle strength that separates the ladies from the men. i'm sure there are women that have more strength in their legs than me and can compete with above average men at top club riding level, but pit the best olympic standard woman against the best olympic standard man and i reckon she'd have the same problem. the man would just have the edge.
i don't think i'm being sexist or letting my side down when i say that. From what i remember, men have 57% muscle and women have something more like 27% muscle in their body (can't remember the exact figures but it's something like that). and that's the starting point. you can only build on what you've got. also women have a higher fat ratio (to protect our offspring) so another thing we have to fight harder. we are genetically different, although there are variations of course. but basically we're working twice as hard to be just as good.
So, the only way they are ever going to really sort it is to put a female team in the TdF. something i'd love to see!!!
(of course, if we have to work twice as hard to be just as good, just because of our genetics, this does, in fact, mean we're better!)