- Location
- Glasgow
Style above substance - the curse of the modern age.
Not by me lolI was either dissed or judged.
Not by me lol
I'm 55 and an old 3 speed roadster wouldn't cut it for me either!
Imo, if you can afford it, spend it: money on good, long lasting, efficient components is never wasted.
All you actually require for travelling over poor surfaces is a strong bike with robust tyres that don't puncture too easily. There are plenty of people in the developing world that manage fine with an old 3-speed roadster.
^Which is best for the price? Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
But times move on. You can't compare old 90's bikes to modern MTBs...…...
Expanding on this the main revolution in terms of new bike specs are geometry. Manufacturers have honed newer bikes and the way they ride based on tweaking head angles, bottom bracket heights, chainstay lengths, wheel base etc to make them ride great for the specific intended MTB discipline.
Looking at a full suss will open up a completely new can of worms. For the 1000 dollars you are looking at spending you will get a lot lower spec bike and need higher maintanance (rear shock, pivot bearing replacements etc) I rate Manitou forks but don't like single pivot full suss frames.
However, the trend to specialise MTB designs for various disciplines has made the bikes less useable for general mixed surface riding, which is what the OP indicates they want one for.
I am looking for a bike that I can use for all my needs. As you said, one that can be a "jack of all trades". However, the simpler the bike gets, the less options I have with it!
In which case, get a good spec hardtail.
Apart from downhill, both the ones I own cover everything, from commute to XC, mountains to roads, tarmac to snow.
Can I come over and do the Tour Divide? Assuming you are in the USA.
Not sure if you were speaking to me. Don't know what you mean by that. The Tour Divide sounds like a good way to shed off years of life energy out of anyone, but also like a fun experience.