hence why i put 'an awful lot' rather than most...in my experience most of the cyclists I know don't drive, then again I'm from London where a driving license is a luxury that a lot can't afford and don't need. My brother is a prime example - he doesn't drive, rarely even gets in a car as none of his friends or family (bar me) drive...he's a great cyclist but wow is he shoot at judging what cars are likely to do. He gets really angry at drivers when actually, some times its his fault/could have helped the situation. We went on a 4 day ride recently and I think it was a real eye opener for him to cycle with a driver (me) who could explain some of the subtler nuances of how cars/vans/lorries work, what visibility is like, and when they are right/wrong. I deffo think there should be more emphasis on getting bikes and cars to understand how the other works. When I did my cycling proficiency test, we were taught to ride on the pavement, now you use a mix of road, pavement and bike paths and I feel some cyclists and a lot of car drivers just aren't thinking about the other when they are using shared space.