gbb
Squire
- Location
- Peterborough
I'd rather assume and hope BR (bike radar) wouldn't publish rubbish. And there lies the never ending problem with the Internet, one question, 16 different answers.I don't know who or BR is/are, but the quoted Quade is certainly not an engineer. Besides, he uses the word "Stretch", so I can't take him seriously.
It is ridiculous to think that the roller can wear sideways without causing pin wear. How on earth does he propose that you pedal with less torque than the tiny lateral force applied to a chain that's not running in a perfect chainline. He proposes a pedaling torque of say 10 or 12 NM for thousands of kilometers. C'mon!
Further, have a good look at the number of links between the guide pulley and sprocket - the chain shift area. See for yourself if you think flexibility can influence this. Just turn your bike upside down and look at this.
I'm not suggesting the above is absolutely correct, I don't know of course who is right, I have no idea if you, they or anyone else is....it's all unsubstantiated (to me) words. It's sounds plausible, so that's enough to allow me to simply consider the fact.
An analogy....a Nigerian guy told me he had a million squid waiting for me if I give him my bank details. They're just words to me, same as yours and BRs and anyone else's I could dig up. Plausibliity is my driving consideration.
It's all hypothetical, I've never got a chain to the stage where it could or couldn't cause that problem....so I'm just musing and discussing.