Don't get me wrong, we have ridden with Steve during his attempt and would like nothing better than for him to succeed, unfortunately there are too many things that can go wrong when you are doing 200 miles every day in all weathers. At the very least I believe a network of volunteers spread around the country with access to a vehicle would have been extremely useful. All this is easy to say with hindsight, but we do have some experience of long distance cycling / competing and understand how quickly things can go pear shaped because of relatively small things.
If he is yet to succeed, and I believe it is just about possible, luck will have to be on his side along with considerably more help. Just my thoughts.
I don't think Steve is the issue. Its his fans and supporters that have given him loads of encouragement but little advice on planning or calling out when something does not make sense. Compared to Kurt, Steve had a bigger team and supposedly an expert on long distance cycling.
We as a society tend to be coy about giving contrary advice. The Americans on the other hand friend or no friend will call out when a mate is doing something wrong. He should have been advised to take a complete break and come back after a few months.
So its not about network or luck. It better organisation and planning and that does not necessarily relate to having a bigger team.