Fastrack said:
As a duathlete now concentrating on my better talent of running I am amazed by Rob3rt's comments. Currently ranked 3rd in my age group in the Uk over the marathon distance, you simply don't get there without pushing close to the edge. Resting heart rate isn't sensitive enough and aches and pains are part and parcel of the over-reach phase of training. By the time you get to loss of motivation or falling ill you haven't got near to the edge, you have fallen off. I admit I have been there too and that is why I am trying iTHLETE. I am not happy with 3rd and I know that if I do the same as last year then I will be 3rd again at best. I need to go to the next level in a controlled and beneficial way and that is where I believe iTHLETE could come in. There has been lots of good studies on heart rate variabilty but so far no easy way of measuring it. If you already have an iPOD or iPHONE the iTHLETE seems a very simple and cost effective way of using HRV. The whole elite world of performance is talking about training smarter. Time to get smart Rob3rt!
Your achievements are great.
But I am fully aware some aches and pains are part of the parcel, but if you know your body (which should be your priority) then you should know which aches and pains are acceptable to train through and which are not.
This device is most likely, most useful when used in conjunction with knowing your own body and being able to interpret your own feelings, in the majority of cases, once you are at this point, a device like this is already redundant because you can already tell when you should hold back and when to push on. For most people it is more likely to be an interuption to training schedules by giving false, rest day hits.
Im not an expert, im quite the newby, so maybe im ignorant to some degree, but in my opinion, someone of my level (pretty low level), and quite far beyond my level would not benefit at all from this device, over standard HR and percieved level of exertion measures.
Maybe someone at your level can glean some teensy little bit of an advantage from it, which is what someone from your level will be looking to do. But then again, at your level maybe your experience already makes this thing almost if not completelly redundant.
I will admit, before making my initial post, I was ignorant to the OP's level, aims etc, so maybe it would benefit the OP. Im looking at this product more as the following: A lot of people seem to want all the technology to apparently train smart as you say, but actually they are so overwhelmed with data that they dont know how to interpret because they have little to no base understanding of their own body yet so they stuggle to relate the data to their intuition, so in effect they are pretty much just wasting their money (again a trap I have fallen into, luckily, I got some great advice from Bill Gates ^^ and a few other members here) In my views, training smart isnt all about having tonnes of data, its about getting the most out of the minimum, in order to acheive your goal.