Hi All,
I don't currently have a work stand but I commute by bike and so try to clean plus maintain my bike as much as possible.
I've now got fed up with trying to maintain my bike whilst leaning it against things or trying to hold it with one hand and trying to work on it with the other and so I've decided that I need to but a work stand.
Having not had one before I'm confused about the pros and cons of the various ways of attaching the bike to the work stand. I appreciate that which method of attaching the bike to a stand might be personal preference but I'm also wondering whether different methods are more appropriate for certain types of bike or if there are just genuine benefits/negative points of different mounting options.
I've thought about buying a stand from Lidl / Aldi but because I commute all year around and I will hopefully make a lot of use of the stand I'm thinking that it might be worth saving a bit more and trying to buy something sturdy that will hopefully last for years.
Today I read this review of the Feedback Sports Sprint Work Stand on the Road CC website.
http://road.cc/content/review/154719-feedback-sports-sprint-workstand
Then when I went to read some details about the stand on the Feedback Sports website one thing which caught my attention is that they have two different stands at a very similar price point.
There's the Sprint as reviewed in Road CC:-
http://www.feedbacksports.com/shop/sprint-work-stand/
But also the Pro-Elite:-
http://www.feedbacksports.com/shop/pro-elite-work-stand/
Looking at them it looks as if the Pro-Elite might clamp to the seatpost/frame whereas the Sprint attaches at the fork(s)?
I just wondered if anyone has any thoughts on the pros / cons of the two methods? I'm assuming that if the stand has to use the forks to attach to the work stand you'd always have to have at least one wheel off?
Thanks for any thoughts on the pros versus cons of either stand &/or the different ways of clamping a bike to a work stand.
Cheers,
John
I don't currently have a work stand but I commute by bike and so try to clean plus maintain my bike as much as possible.
I've now got fed up with trying to maintain my bike whilst leaning it against things or trying to hold it with one hand and trying to work on it with the other and so I've decided that I need to but a work stand.
Having not had one before I'm confused about the pros and cons of the various ways of attaching the bike to the work stand. I appreciate that which method of attaching the bike to a stand might be personal preference but I'm also wondering whether different methods are more appropriate for certain types of bike or if there are just genuine benefits/negative points of different mounting options.
I've thought about buying a stand from Lidl / Aldi but because I commute all year around and I will hopefully make a lot of use of the stand I'm thinking that it might be worth saving a bit more and trying to buy something sturdy that will hopefully last for years.
Today I read this review of the Feedback Sports Sprint Work Stand on the Road CC website.
http://road.cc/content/review/154719-feedback-sports-sprint-workstand
Then when I went to read some details about the stand on the Feedback Sports website one thing which caught my attention is that they have two different stands at a very similar price point.
There's the Sprint as reviewed in Road CC:-
http://www.feedbacksports.com/shop/sprint-work-stand/
But also the Pro-Elite:-
http://www.feedbacksports.com/shop/pro-elite-work-stand/
Looking at them it looks as if the Pro-Elite might clamp to the seatpost/frame whereas the Sprint attaches at the fork(s)?
I just wondered if anyone has any thoughts on the pros / cons of the two methods? I'm assuming that if the stand has to use the forks to attach to the work stand you'd always have to have at least one wheel off?
Thanks for any thoughts on the pros versus cons of either stand &/or the different ways of clamping a bike to a work stand.
Cheers,
John