Why include locked threads in the Big Cafe Threads?

[classic33]

They're old and its not as though they can be added to!

 

[Pat "5mph"]

Folks might like to read them?
They are part of CC's history after all.

 

[Shaun]

Because they're big ...

 

[classic33]

Given that this is the final post in the oldest one still open for reply is
"Have we finished with this thread then?"

on the road,2 Oct 2012

 

[classic33]

Because they're big ...

But they can't get any bigger.

 

[Pat "5mph"]

Good idea @Shaun not to count those post, you are gently steering us towards more cycling related topics.
We need "gentle steering"

 

[classic33]

Because they're big ...

Can't argue with "logic" like that!!

 

[classic33]

Folks might like to read them?
They are part of CC's history after all.

Nothing stopping anyone from reading them before either!!!

 

[Pat "5mph"]

Nothing stopping anyone from reading them before either!!!

The locked ones are ancient history, archives like

 

[ColinJ]

Ha ha - I have lost about 700 from my post count, but clearly some even more Mundane Tea? posters have lost a lot more because I have leapfrogged them up into the top 20!

 

[classic33]

Good idea @Shaun not to count those post, you are gently steering us towards more cycling related topics.
We need "gentle steering"

And when "gentle steering" fails, bring out the fluffy pink bunnies!!

 

[classic33]

How do we know when we start a new thread, its going to be big enough to place in there, when we start it?

 

[Arch]

Good idea @Shaun not to count those post, you are gently steering us towards more cycling related topics.
We need "gentle steering"

Why? There's a whole rest of the forum for cycle related stuff, the Cafe is the place to go off-topic.

I'm not happy about splitting it. Threads stand or fall on popularity.

 

[Puddles]

Because they're big ...

And? this means what? and why?

 

[coffeejo]

But it's the community that makes CC so great.