Upstream
Active Member
Hi all,
Here's the situation... There is one particular strava segment near me that I really want to be the fastest on. I need to do it four seconds faster than my best so far. The section is 1.1 miles long and the terrain is something like this;
My question is one of physics... When I'm going down that hill that I could freewheel at around 20mph, instead of pushing hard to 30+mph, would I use less energy to sit at say low to mid 20's then then use that conserved energy through section 2 or is it more energy efficient to push even harder than I have been doing in section one and then enter section 2 with a fair bit of speed to carry me through section 2?
My average speed is 25.5 and I need to get to an average of 26.2 to take it ;-)
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Here's the situation... There is one particular strava segment near me that I really want to be the fastest on. I need to do it four seconds faster than my best so far. The section is 1.1 miles long and the terrain is something like this;
- Downhill section where if I freewheeled, I could get to about 20mph. It then flattens out after about a quarter of a mile and then
- Slightly uphill for another quarter of a mile followed by
- Slight descent for about another quarter of a mile before
- Uphill (but short) bit before the final flattish stretch.
My question is one of physics... When I'm going down that hill that I could freewheel at around 20mph, instead of pushing hard to 30+mph, would I use less energy to sit at say low to mid 20's then then use that conserved energy through section 2 or is it more energy efficient to push even harder than I have been doing in section one and then enter section 2 with a fair bit of speed to carry me through section 2?
My average speed is 25.5 and I need to get to an average of 26.2 to take it ;-)
Any thoughts?
Thanks.