Cycle SQVEThe "suitably qualified valuation expert"?
Those last parts could fall under "collectability", just leaving the problem of getting a seperate valuation to prove you'd not overpaid or that you'd got a bargain.the problem is the word vintage it should be replaced by classic the same as cars. There can be newer bikes that can be worth more because of the manufacturer or provenance ie. a custom build or a race bike.
When did the organisers of Eroica events decide that pre 87 was the shutoff point? L'eroica Italia was started in 1997 so if they stated 87 from the beginning then it would only have been 10 years!Eroica events reckon vintage is pre-1987 IIRC. I think you'd stand a chance of appealing to that definition. Of course, it means most local bike shops selling second-hand bikes are therefore vintage cycle retailers... so another reason to be on good terms with them!
Ah the battle of the spouses!As a rule of thumb, every bike (or pile of components) I've ever owned are classed as vintage by me.
Mrs o classes them, generally, as junk.
HTH
Whilst young'un may well view bikes over 30 years old as vintage. How would that same person view the same bike given the wording on the insurance "small print", if they were the ones having to deal with a claim?When did the organisers of Eroica events decide that pre 87 was the shutoff point? L'eroica Italia was started in 1997 so if they stated 87 from the beginning then it would only have been 10 years!
Is the problem perhaps more about our own "vintage" rather than the age of the bikes? Since most of us on this thread grew up with steel as the "norm" it seems inconceivable that a younger rider might see a 30yr old bike as antique
It's how they apply the wording of "value of the insured". The price paid, minus labour.Did I read e. Right in that the insurance company would only pay out for the bits of a custom built bike?
I would then expect them to only pay out a small proportion due to wear on the components.