As others have implied the Yukon still has a quick geometry, not full on race bike but quick, but fast none the less.
Even though the Euros has a race bike geometry it is infact also aimed at fast day rides more than competitve racing, if you compare it to
Cinook for example you will see the latter has straighter thicker stays with more rigid ends, where as the Euros has shaped stays and less rigid ends; Yukon rear ends are slightly thicker and more rigid than Euros.
If you are saving the bike for fair weather rides without any requirement to carry a pannier rack at any stage then Euros is a good choice, by the same token for all weather use then Yukon would be what most would chose.I intend to use mine for fast days rides and effectively as a replacement for the
bike used in all the cycle tours at linked to at the bottom of this page, so I will be adding a pannier rack to support a rack top bag.
I actually wrote the review of my own bike in the
Road Cycling link that Keith referred to; I was extremely sensative to the fact that I am both an owner of one and a stockist, so lets face it I like them, none the less I believe I was completely objective in all my comments and findings; which is one reason that the Editor Richard Hallet has asked me to write some reviews in the first place, as he knows me well enough to know that I would not be anything other than that.
Paul Smith
www.corridori.co.uk
noggin said:
any comments?
for an extra €250 I get frame that'll take mudguards- that seems to be about the difference and the Yukon is .2 kilos heavier
I do not race- weekend/charidee (mate
) rides and sportives
Only spotted today on the interweb that prices quoted in the bike builder are excl. tax/shipping- bugger!