a.twiddler
Veteran
28/6/24
Under Seat Panniers
I’d been contemplating splurging on some larger panniers for the Spirit. It has a low seat, and the pannier rack is underneath it, rather than set back a little like some other low seat recumbents. The price for that is less space between the seat base and the ground
After a lot of head scratching and measuring I took the plunge and ordered a set of Carradice Super C recumbent Panniers with the CUK discount. They really are enormous at 31l each and I can’t convince myself that they won’t hit the road with enthusiastic cornering when used under the seat on the Spirit. The depth might not be a problem if they weren’t so wide. There’s not much room under there. There is scope for altering the ride height by tensioning the rear shock but it might give a stiff ride when not loaded. Would I really use all that space?
There's about 1 cm clearance in the photos below.
This doesn't allow for me cranking up the rear suspension, then compressing it again with my weight and luggage
They would fit easily on the Linear, with it being relatively tall for a recumbent. The rack on that looks a long way back but that’s because the seat is well forward. The seat stays would prevent panniers coming much further forward in any case as they are wider than the carrier.
There’s something to be said for having luggage behind the seat back to reduce the wind resistance though you then have to accept the rearward weight bias.
Having the weight beneath the seat evens out the load and improves the handling, acceptable with smaller panniers but risking becoming an air brake with wider ones.
I took the small panniers off the Spirit to try out the Super Cs and have been riding around with just the seat back bag but there’s no denying that the small panniers are handy for shopping.
Under Seat Panniers
I’d been contemplating splurging on some larger panniers for the Spirit. It has a low seat, and the pannier rack is underneath it, rather than set back a little like some other low seat recumbents. The price for that is less space between the seat base and the ground
After a lot of head scratching and measuring I took the plunge and ordered a set of Carradice Super C recumbent Panniers with the CUK discount. They really are enormous at 31l each and I can’t convince myself that they won’t hit the road with enthusiastic cornering when used under the seat on the Spirit. The depth might not be a problem if they weren’t so wide. There’s not much room under there. There is scope for altering the ride height by tensioning the rear shock but it might give a stiff ride when not loaded. Would I really use all that space?
There's about 1 cm clearance in the photos below.
This doesn't allow for me cranking up the rear suspension, then compressing it again with my weight and luggage
They would fit easily on the Linear, with it being relatively tall for a recumbent. The rack on that looks a long way back but that’s because the seat is well forward. The seat stays would prevent panniers coming much further forward in any case as they are wider than the carrier.
There’s something to be said for having luggage behind the seat back to reduce the wind resistance though you then have to accept the rearward weight bias.
Having the weight beneath the seat evens out the load and improves the handling, acceptable with smaller panniers but risking becoming an air brake with wider ones.
I took the small panniers off the Spirit to try out the Super Cs and have been riding around with just the seat back bag but there’s no denying that the small panniers are handy for shopping.