Oh the usual rubbish seen in the papers -
cyclist in collision with car
accident, rather than crash
the car left the road
etc
I can't see anything so bad with the above.
"In collision with" is a rather dull phrase, but it does meet the requirement not to apportion blame - unless it's blindingly obvious or there's a police statement to say they are seeking a hit and run driver.
It's a simple fact the cyclist is 'outside', as in astride, his bike whereas the car driver is inside his car.
Thus in any crash/collision, the cyclist will collide with the car, not the driver, unless the poor cyclist is propelled through the windscreen of the car and smacks into the driver.
Most complaints on here about reporting are from posters who perceive slights against cyclists where there are none.
Too many words in the linked guidelines, but what I did read of them looked fair enough.