https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sport...n-disagreement-how-define-fairness/995434001/
Large can of worms to digest here.
Large can of worms to digest here.
My somewhat kneejerk reaction is that for sport to be compelling and "fair" nobody should have an advantage as a result of a characteristic outside that of their competitorshttps://eu.usatoday.com/story/sport...n-disagreement-how-define-fairness/995434001/
Large can of worms to digest here.
This is the but I need to understand better. Say a trans athlete reduced their level to 10, would that allow them a level higher than all non-trans women or higher than 95%, or 75%, or whateverThe Testosterone level permitted for a woman is below 10nmol, blooming heck, that's 5-6 times the normal upper end - women's highest range in nmol is about 1.8. Mens range is 8-30nmol, someone 30-40yrs, male would be about 18-22nmol on average.
This is the but I need to understand better. Say a trans athlete reduced their level to 10, would that allow them a level higher than all non-trans women or higher than 95%, or 75%, or whatever
Higher than all non-trans women....that can't be right. But higher than "most" (however defined) I think is ok