The theory of big

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

classic33

Leg End Member
8 - 10
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
It was like one of those "I am a second year engineering student ..." surveys. I started off thinking "what do you mean by ..." and ended thinking "I can't be arsed with this".
 

winjim

Smash the cistern
"On a shared use path0 (I'd give you minus if I could) "

Stupid prat
They can give you minus, it's their stupid quiz, they made up the rules.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
In the first sentence of the article there were 2 words I'd never heard if so gave up 🤔
"We" and "love"?

As the copyright notice at the bottom suggests, it's been around, and doing the rounds, for 20 years and more. It dates from a more innocent time, before cycling became popular and assertive cycling commonplace, when cyclists were still working out whether hiviz and helmets should be mandatory and when a Brompton commuter in London was a rare enough site that the bike came with a stash of cards to hand out. And when you got stopped at traffic lights by people asking "what is that?" and "isn't it really dangerous to ride a bike?"

It's still a good attempt to summarise the things that a cyclist can do to make themselves more present on a road, even if some of it pushes back onto the rider things which should be with the driver.
 
Top Bottom