The long tubes and suspension will be absorbing more than you realise.
There probably isn't an awful lot of pedalling energy to start with.
Yet the decidedly non sporty Spirit, even with the 16" front wheel, feels more efficient for the energy I put in. That has limited suspension at the front, more movement at the rear (though no noticeable pedal reaction). I suspect the frame is stiffer through having the BB fixed to the frame than to a bolted on tube as with the Grasshopper, though being short the boom is not very extended so less likely to flex than with larger riders. I have noticed that it's possible to make the front suspension of the Grasshopper bob slightly at certain cadences, easily solved by changing gear. I would have expected the Spirit mesh seat to be more flexy than the hard shell one of the Grasshopper. The most obvious difference is the seat recline of the Grasshopper.
The subjective feel is that the Grasshopper is hard work, while the Spirit is not. Objectively, the Garmin shows easier speeds and about 2mph higher averages locally for the Spirit. While I certainly don't do Audaxes on anything, the Spirit feels capable of more than the several 55 mile plus rides I did last year on it, and I was hoping to stretch it out further before I was struck down by the lurgy.
I am comparing these two because they are from the same manufacturer and have the same SRAM Dualdrive transmission and 20" rear wheel, and even a Schwalbe Marathon tyre.
They seem to be aimed at different riders though, the Spirit being a mere "urban recumbent" while the Grasshopper seems to be intended for "proper recumbentists" for all round use and touring. A bike for the aspirational. I've read so many good reviews. It's a bike that actually fits me! On paper, the Grasshopper ought to be the faster and more capable bike. It certainly looks the business. I'd hoped that it might even replace my other bikes. Unfortunately it doesn't work for me.
In the time that I've had the Spirit, the feeling has grown that it's a very underrated bike, capable of a lot more than just going to town for the shopping.
Now as for the Linear, well I've come to appreciate it even more since having the Grasshopper. A low tech solution, no suspension, no chain tubes or rollers. A bit rough and ready in some respects, eminently rideable, comfortable, adaptable and fixable. If anything should be flexy and inefficient, it's this one, yet it's so relaxed and easy riding. Despite that long dangly chain, the pedalling effort gets (eventually) to the back wheel. It climbs well, if slowly, without me feeling as if I need to be resuscitated at the top. I need to organise a long overdue rematch with Alsagers Bank this year. It can go anywhere that its length will allow.