Lo Fidelity & other websites recently posted this Dutch video showing a major reaction against a road user who caused very minor injuries to three cyclists: http://www.youtube.c...player_embedded
Another example of a nirvana I know I shall never see here in my lifetime. Whilst activists argue for and against vehicular cycling and appropriate infrastructure, investment and all other sorts of things to get more cyclists on the road - one question keeps coming back to me ...
"Why did the Dutch drivers vote for their near extinction?"
Their car culture/modal share was much the same as ours. But the majority voted for the minority and then mostly joined them. Meanwhile in the UK more will say we should pay road tax then have segregated lanes or a law requiring minimum passing distances. Until that attitude changes then nothing significant is going to happen.
So how did the Dutch change it? Thats the 3,000 a year dead question.
Another example of a nirvana I know I shall never see here in my lifetime. Whilst activists argue for and against vehicular cycling and appropriate infrastructure, investment and all other sorts of things to get more cyclists on the road - one question keeps coming back to me ...
"Why did the Dutch drivers vote for their near extinction?"
Their car culture/modal share was much the same as ours. But the majority voted for the minority and then mostly joined them. Meanwhile in the UK more will say we should pay road tax then have segregated lanes or a law requiring minimum passing distances. Until that attitude changes then nothing significant is going to happen.
So how did the Dutch change it? Thats the 3,000 a year dead question.