Who is the greatest of all time then? All the greats were made better than they ever could be by doping.
There is/was no single "greatest". There are several in every era and discipline. For instance, Chris Hoy may have been amongst the greatest kilometre/sprint/keirin riders in his era. Whether he was the greatest in that era is a subjective opinion. Which is what Blazed is offering, and is entitled to feel that way, even if lots of others think that it's not a valid opinion.
In summary, the whole discussion is pointless, and I'm thinking that statements like "cycling was a backwater sport until LA appeared" can only be made by someone (maybe US based?) who has never looked into Europe or enjoyed a long connection with the sport. Then, that's just my subjective opinion, and what do I know after all the years? Maybe if I had given in to temptation and used certain help I would have made more money, but then looking people in the eye and being able to say "I was clean" is a lot better all these years later.