The only thing no-one has mentioned thus far is the extra stress a longer travel fork may put on your frame and the refusal of any warranty claim relating to it. Longer forks do subject the frame (in the head tube area) to greater strain. If your bike is out of warranty anyway, or you're not intending to get too hardcore, I'm sure it'll be fine. You may as well fit your new fork and enjoy. I only mention it for completeness' sake, and just in case you're worried about warranty.
It will feel different though like Norm says. May feel better on descents with the slacker head angle and more upright ride. You'll notice it being a bit more stable on descents (the flip side being slower-steering in the twisties). You may also notice a difference in how the muscles in the top of your thighs feel. A higher BB will give you a little more clearance under the chainrings. Depending on how sensitive you are to such things, you might find yourself wanting to fettle other things (seat and handlebar angle and height etc) to compensate - but these would be minimal if at all.
I stuck a sus fork on an ancient (1988) Cannondale which I had in the days when all MTBs were fully rigid (or had FlexStems like in the pic). OK, 'Dale frames from that vintage were seriously heavy duty, but I've given it all sorts of stick over the years and it's still fine. This frame was never designed to take a sus fork. Everyone told me the same things as I've just mentioned, but like I say, the frame coped fine and the bike's handling was so fast that it needed calming down slightly anyway.
Shame really that this once-magnificent singletrack slayer has been relegated to my shopping hack.