Chris Bore
New Member
Hi
I'm thinking of buying a 'mountain bike'. I like the Raleigh Voyager LX Comfort Bike, but I'm not sure how to assess it or compare against what else is available. I'm also wondering if such a bike could replace my road bike or if its top gear would be too low?
I am 52 years old, and regularly ride my (20 year old) Raleigh Pioneer which I think is a 'hybrid' (it has thick-ish typres but is otherwise a road bike). Typically, I cycle three or four times a week, for leisure, usually 12 miles with one 16 mile ride (with Surrey hills) each week. About every two weeks I do a longer ride, like 40 or 50 miles. I'm fine with the Pioneer. Typically I average 12 mph, I do about 16-20 mph on the flat and up to a max of 35 mph downhill. The Pioneer has 18 gears and I use the top gear a lot, the smallest pedal chain gear wheel never.
Because the Raleigh Pioneer has lastest so long with no trouble, and I still like it so much, I'm tempted to stick to Raleigh but I don't know if that is sensible.
The Voyager has 21 gears, but I think its top gears would be lower than my Pioneer - is that so? I wouldn't like to do a long ride in a lower gear.
My reason to buy the Voyager is so I can cycle on tracks. I'm not aiming to go off tracks for excitement or spills, but I do want to be able to cycle up (and down) some very rough tracks - if you know my area then I am talking about Box Hill (steep, chalk) and Newlands Corner )steep, gravel).
I'd greatly value advice on whether a bike like the Raleigh Voyager would suit me, and also if it could be a replacement for my road bike or if I'd need to keep both? Also, if anyone has ridden the Voyaegr and can comment, or would recommend I look at some other model or make.
Thanks in advance to anyone who replies.
Chris
============
Surrey
I'm thinking of buying a 'mountain bike'. I like the Raleigh Voyager LX Comfort Bike, but I'm not sure how to assess it or compare against what else is available. I'm also wondering if such a bike could replace my road bike or if its top gear would be too low?
I am 52 years old, and regularly ride my (20 year old) Raleigh Pioneer which I think is a 'hybrid' (it has thick-ish typres but is otherwise a road bike). Typically, I cycle three or four times a week, for leisure, usually 12 miles with one 16 mile ride (with Surrey hills) each week. About every two weeks I do a longer ride, like 40 or 50 miles. I'm fine with the Pioneer. Typically I average 12 mph, I do about 16-20 mph on the flat and up to a max of 35 mph downhill. The Pioneer has 18 gears and I use the top gear a lot, the smallest pedal chain gear wheel never.
Because the Raleigh Pioneer has lastest so long with no trouble, and I still like it so much, I'm tempted to stick to Raleigh but I don't know if that is sensible.
The Voyager has 21 gears, but I think its top gears would be lower than my Pioneer - is that so? I wouldn't like to do a long ride in a lower gear.
My reason to buy the Voyager is so I can cycle on tracks. I'm not aiming to go off tracks for excitement or spills, but I do want to be able to cycle up (and down) some very rough tracks - if you know my area then I am talking about Box Hill (steep, chalk) and Newlands Corner )steep, gravel).
I'd greatly value advice on whether a bike like the Raleigh Voyager would suit me, and also if it could be a replacement for my road bike or if I'd need to keep both? Also, if anyone has ridden the Voyaegr and can comment, or would recommend I look at some other model or make.
Thanks in advance to anyone who replies.
Chris
============
Surrey