KneesUp
Guru
I'm cobbling together a second 90s MTB so I can have one with slicks fort own use and one with knobblies for tow-path and woods use, rather than having to swap things around. The frame for this 'new' bike is a rather unglamorous (and therefore unlikely to be stolen) Raleigh Yukon from 1990-ish I reckon. Some of the tubes are 501. I suspect only three.
Anyway, it's in good condition and was very cheap, so I can't complain - it looks hardly ridden to be honest - the black rims are still pretty much black and the brake blocks look original. However, when I was stripping it down before I noticed that the mudguard bridge doesn't actually connect the chainstays together - it doesn't reach the drive side.
I've never noticed this on a bike before, and wondered if this is common, or if it's possibly a result of Raleigh just using up the size of bridge they had in stock? Or are they not actually structural anyway (I'd imagine they ad stiffness?) and this is a 'weight saving feature'?
Anyway, it's in good condition and was very cheap, so I can't complain - it looks hardly ridden to be honest - the black rims are still pretty much black and the brake blocks look original. However, when I was stripping it down before I noticed that the mudguard bridge doesn't actually connect the chainstays together - it doesn't reach the drive side.
I've never noticed this on a bike before, and wondered if this is common, or if it's possibly a result of Raleigh just using up the size of bridge they had in stock? Or are they not actually structural anyway (I'd imagine they ad stiffness?) and this is a 'weight saving feature'?