SPDs

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

gavintc

Guru
Location
Southsea
Easier to walk in than SPD SLs or other road systems. A good commuter pedal.
 

alecstilleyedye

nothing in moderation
Moderator
cons:

not as efficient in putting leg power through to the pedal. if you are riding 50 miles with a short café stop, why choose shoes that are better to walk in for 20 feet over ones that are better for riding 50 miles?

personally i'm not a big fan of spd (tried it, not impressed) and use look delta's even on my commute.
 

HJ

Cycling in Scotland
Location
Auld Reekie
Depends on how long you are pedalling for at any one time. In town when you are constantly stopping and starting they can be a wee bit of a faff (especially if you are not used to them) but once you have a bit of open road they are a lot more efficient. You can go for longer and climb better. If you do a lot of mixed cycling, ie commuting, shopping and longer trips at weekends, you might consider a something like the Shimano A530http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=28050.
 

Randochap

Senior hunter
SPD Pros: Easy to walk on (good for commuters) Easy to clip in and out. Don't clog easily. Good price range. Common.

Cons: Usually a bit heavier than road pedals.

I use Speedplay. Has "unlimited" float. Incredibly light. Larhe platform (cleat). Cons: Not easy to walk on. Cleat can clog if you walk in mud. Expensive
 

spence

Über Member
Location
Northants
The best thing you can do for your bike (or maybe lock on grips) and you. XT's (or XTR's if you can afford the extra for the bling factor) they just work.

You'll wonder why you didn't do it years ago.......
 

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
I hope I am not teaching you to suck eggs here but the term SPD has become generic in the same way as a Vacuum cleaner became a Hoover. The Shimano system (the true SPD) is, IMHO, simply amazing. The type of shoe ranges from trainer(esk) touring shoes to shoes that have the same flexibility as clogs - Greater stiffness = more power transfer.

So Pros - You become one with the bike and impossible hills become possible. You will never want to go back to flats again.

Cons - Initial outlay expensive for shoes (pedals can be dirt cheep). You will never want to go back to flats again.
 

grhm

Veteran
Angelfishsolo said:
You will never want to go back to flats again.

I used to think that too - but now know several who tried SPD's (one for years) and have since gone back to (and prefer) flats.

One claimed he didn't like that spd's made his pedalling technique lazy and that bunny jumping is easier with flats. He rides mostly off-road trails I think. I've not had a chance to question him for more than two minutes about it though, so don't follow his reasoning fully.
 

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
Interesting. I mainly ride n off road trails and on the one occasion I had to ride on flats found cycling a nightmare. Still every rule has an exception or two :biggrin:
grhm said:
I used to think that too - but now know several who tried SPD's (one for years) and have since gone back to (and prefer) flats.

One claimed he didn't like that spd's made his pedalling technique lazy and that bunny jumping is easier with flats. He rides mostly off-road trails I think. I've not had a chance to question him for more than two minutes about it though, so don't follow his reasoning fully.
 
OP
OP
dingdongdead

dingdongdead

Well-Known Member
Angelfishsolo said:
I hope I am not teaching you to suck eggs here but teh term SPD has been generic in rthe same way as a Vacume cleaner became a Hoover. .

oh-mei-gawd. i had no iydeer. pardon mee fr being an uber n00b and not realizing teh correct terminology
 

jay

New Member
So why are roadie spds more efficient than mtb spds (of any type)? Do they flex less? Weigh more? Less float? More efficient bearings? Better aerodynamics? Combination of the above?

Surely if I'm wearing shoes of equal stiffness then any differences must be negligible between roadie/mtb pedals of equal quality? Have any claims of increased efficiency ever actually been proven or is it just one of those things people trot out without really thinking it through? (No offence to the poster of the reply!)
 
Top Bottom