Skoda Roomster
- Thread starter User
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
They are based on the Fabia, I've had 3 of those, all good reliable cars. The Roomster looks a bit odd but has loads of rear space and removable rear seats.
Best resource about them, and Skodas in general is here: www.briskoda.net
Best resource about them, and Skodas in general is here: www.briskoda.net
Saluki
World class procrastinator
- Location
- ...Norwich over the water.
[QUOTE 2932158, member: 45"]We're thinking of buying one. Anyone have any experience of them?[/quote]
If I had the money, I would have one in a heartbeat. Great cars.
I had one as a hire car for a week and loved it to bits.
If I had the money, I would have one in a heartbeat. Great cars.
I had one as a hire car for a week and loved it to bits.
Richard A Thackeray
Legendary Member
+1 for it here too
We test-drove one (had it as a courtesy car) whilst our Octavia estate (1.6Tdi) was being serviced at the main-dealer
Would I have one??, not sure, I'd prefer a Yeti, but I really want a Superb estate next time (Tdi, 140BHP, 6-speed, 4x4 hopefully!!)
[QUOTE 2932201, member: 45"]
We've got a Fabia and it's great,[/quote]
We had a first generation Fabia, as a 1.4Mpi estate ('03 plate') , still maintain that it's the best small car I've ever driven!!
Far better than the contemporary Polo & Fiesta!
We test-drove one (had it as a courtesy car) whilst our Octavia estate (1.6Tdi) was being serviced at the main-dealer
Would I have one??, not sure, I'd prefer a Yeti, but I really want a Superb estate next time (Tdi, 140BHP, 6-speed, 4x4 hopefully!!)
[QUOTE 2932201, member: 45"]
We've got a Fabia and it's great,[/quote]
We had a first generation Fabia, as a 1.4Mpi estate ('03 plate') , still maintain that it's the best small car I've ever driven!!
Far better than the contemporary Polo & Fiesta!
oldfatfool
Guru
I ran a 1.2 htp 69 bhp for a couple of years as a dog wagon. No problems, very comfy, suprisingly enjoyable to drive but very low geared. We ordered a 105 tsi as its replacement but due to panoramic roof supply problems early 2013 we ended up with an Octy. The only issue with the roomster was because swmbo is on the shorter side she found the B pillar a little wide at the base. Would have another in a heartbeat especially with the cycle holder in the boot.
mr messy
Veteran
- Location
- Sunny? Glasgow, the friendly city...
Fabia Estate has slightly larger boot than Roomster though changes round with seats down
mr messy
Veteran
- Location
- Sunny? Glasgow, the friendly city...
Just avoid 3 cylinder engine. Fabias are one of the few "small" cars you can actually see out of!
All these modern safety features built into cars at the expense of vision....go figure!
All these modern safety features built into cars at the expense of vision....go figure!
[QUOTE 2932201, member: 45"]1.2tsi 85bhp[/quote]
Nice. My last Fabia had the 105 TSI, and it was a revelation! it had just been introduced and there were very few cars around with that engine fitted, so I never had a chance to test drive it. Need not have worried, it had loads of punch and would haul loads without even thinking about it. 55mpg economy was just the icing on the cake! I'd definately have another one.
Nice. My last Fabia had the 105 TSI, and it was a revelation! it had just been introduced and there were very few cars around with that engine fitted, so I never had a chance to test drive it. Need not have worried, it had loads of punch and would haul loads without even thinking about it. 55mpg economy was just the icing on the cake! I'd definately have another one.
We (well the wife's) are on our second now. Mainly because, with the internal cycle carrier, we can transport 3 bikes in comfort. There is loads of room, and it all sits on a compact platform. And it can carry loads of luggage if packaged well.
The first was a '56 plate 1.9 Roomster 3. Bit noisy, but good specs. But. The gearbox disintegrated at 60k miles, and there were a few other problems too. Typical VW weak points really. Good mpg though, at around 55mpg.
So we bought a new one last year, with a 5 year warranty this time. 1.6TDi SE Plus I think. The face-lifted model rides a lot better, and the engine a lot quieter. But a year old model is really good value, as they drop in value quickly. mpg is slightly worse, but a nice smooth diesel. The 1.4 TSi (105 bhp?) is supposed to be the best engine through. I would not recommend a lower power engine. Once loaded up they can be sluggish.
Apart from that, spec is good. Panoramic roof makes an airy cabin. Radio has very good sound quality. And is an easy drive, good on motorway, although the seat squabs are shallow if you are a tall driver. Simple to park and manoeuvre. They are quite under-rated due to the badge and looks. And Skoda service is very good. I . think that they are great for cyclists - not many cars have an internal bike rack that is also simple to use.
The first was a '56 plate 1.9 Roomster 3. Bit noisy, but good specs. But. The gearbox disintegrated at 60k miles, and there were a few other problems too. Typical VW weak points really. Good mpg though, at around 55mpg.
So we bought a new one last year, with a 5 year warranty this time. 1.6TDi SE Plus I think. The face-lifted model rides a lot better, and the engine a lot quieter. But a year old model is really good value, as they drop in value quickly. mpg is slightly worse, but a nice smooth diesel. The 1.4 TSi (105 bhp?) is supposed to be the best engine through. I would not recommend a lower power engine. Once loaded up they can be sluggish.
Apart from that, spec is good. Panoramic roof makes an airy cabin. Radio has very good sound quality. And is an easy drive, good on motorway, although the seat squabs are shallow if you are a tall driver. Simple to park and manoeuvre. They are quite under-rated due to the badge and looks. And Skoda service is very good. I . think that they are great for cyclists - not many cars have an internal bike rack that is also simple to use.
The Brewer
Shed Dweller
- Location
- Wrexham
Drive a 1.2 in work and with my limited knowledge of cars it seems pretty good. Shifts when you put the foot down, nice options for seating and a big glass roof, front of the cars a bit cramped though. Toys and stereo is basic, but guess that can be upgraded. Pretty good with fuel consumption.... I'd have one 
Richard A Thackeray
Legendary Member
'Old'
Bought new, 2003, owned until 2008
And 'new'
Taken day we bought it; 9th March 2012 (@ 6 months old, & 6,000 miles - now on 59,000)
Bought new, 2003, owned until 2008
And 'new'
Taken day we bought it; 9th March 2012 (@ 6 months old, & 6,000 miles - now on 59,000)
+1 for that site, I'm on there, under same name as on here
Last edited:
biggs682
Itching to get back on my bike's
- Location
- Northamptonshire
we looked at them when they first came out looked good but must admit didnt buy , cant remember why