Porche and the £25 Congestion Charge

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Received this morning;

PORSCHE UPDATE ON JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCESS

July 2008

Legal campaign update -
Porsche wins victory in congestion charge challenge

Thank you very much for your support as we challenged
Mayor Livingstone's proposed £25 congestion charge in London.
As you saw for yourself, the congestion charge was a major issue
in the mayoral campaign and the candidate who opposed this
extension, Boris Johnson, was elected Mayor.

I am pleased to inform you that, today, the Administrative Court
in London has approved a consent order quashing the increase to
the charge. The new Mayor's legal team accepted that the
previous Mayoral administration should have taken into account
research from King's College which showed that the new charge
would actually increase CO2 emissions in Greater London and,
consequently that the new charge could, in fact, be unlawful.

Porsche has always been confident that the legal case was right
and now we are proud to have played a decisive role in striking
down such a blatantly political tax targeting motorists.

It is expected that significant legal costs will be awarded and
Porsche has decided to donate those costs to a fantastic charity
called Skidz, which takes at-risk young people and trains them in
motor vehicle maintenance and mechanics. This gives them the
tools and confidence they need to find gainful employment and
avoid a life of crime.

The support from Porsche will allow Skidz to open a facility in
Hillingdon, providing this opportunity to young Londoners for
the first time.

If you have any further comments or questions, you can contact
Porsche directly by e-mail at judicial.review@porsche.co.uk or
telephone 08457 911 911.

Thank you again for your support which was tremendously
encouraging and important to the challenge.

Yours sincerely,

Andy Goss
Managing Director
 

zimzum42

Legendary Member
Hillingdon is a dump....
 

LLB

Guest
It is a shame that it didn't come to court in Red Kens reign. It proves that his was the politics of envy, and had nothing to do with congestion busting or making a real difference to CO2 emissions in the capital :biggrin:
 

jonesy

Guru
Oh ffs- this was not a victory for Porche at all: Boris had made it perfectly clear during the election that he was going to scrap the proposed charge and that is what he has done. If he had supported it then I really don't see why a car company would have the legal right to overturn a decision made by an elected government.
 

domtyler

Über Member
Good for Porsche I say, they have won a good victory as this extra charge would have actually increased pollution and congestion in London for everyone.
 

jonesy

Guru
domtyler said:
Good for Porsche I say, they have won a good victory as this extra charge would have actually increased pollution and congestion in London for everyone.

:rolleyes:

How many times?! Boris always said he'd scrap the charge, Boris scrapped the charge. The Porche case had nothing to do with it.

No, it wouldn't have increased pollution- read the impact assessment. There was a risk of increasing congestion but the charges were to have been reviewed and revised if necessary. Now I'd agree that the 100% exemptions for small cars was a serious flaw that undermined the principle of a congestion charge, but if you are going to object then please do so on the basis of an informed opinion...
 

domtyler

Über Member
Yeah, Go Porsche!! :rolleyes:
 

domtyler

Über Member
mjones said:
:rolleyes:

How many times?! Boris always said he'd scrap the charge, Boris scrapped the charge. The Porche case had nothing to do with it.

No, it wouldn't have increased pollution- read the impact assessment. There was a risk of increasing congestion but the charges were to have been reviewed and revised if necessary. Now I'd agree that the 100% exemptions for small cars was a serious flaw that undermined the principle of a congestion charge, but if you are going to object then please do so on the basis of an informed opinion...

Okay I will make one serious point then, they actually interviewed Ken on London Tonight last evening and his main thrust was that "Well he'll [Boris] have to raise the money from somewhere else then because he's got a whole new generation of Route Masters [the Red Double Deckers] to pay for in the next five years.".

Interpret that as you will.
 

domtyler

Über Member
mickle said:
How annoying, I start a thread and two of the contributors are on my ignore list.

Just need Corporal Punishment to join in and I'll have the full set.

Just grow up and delete the Ignore list Mickle. This can't go on forever! :rolleyes:
 

LLB

Guest
mickle said:
How annoying, I start a thread and two of the contributors are on my ignore list.

Just need Corporal Punishment to join in and I'll have the full set.
Mickle is a knob :rolleyes:
 
Top Bottom