I think it's an excellent way of putting the point across. Can't see how it could be negative unless you're referring to the idea that people might think cycling is (more) dangerous so they won't take it up.
I think it's an excellent way of putting the point across. Can't see how it could be negative unless you're referring to the idea that people might think cycling is (more) dangerous so they won't take it up.
Bikes are vulnerable. Cars are dangerous. Its a boiling frog scenario. Go back to when your grandfather was a little boy and explain that people would be whizzing around on cycles, all sounds ok. Suggest that in 60 years time, people will routinely drive 2 tonne steel cages through the heart of our towns at 30mph, and he'll call you crazy.
Bikes are vulnerable. Cars are dangerous. Its a boiling frog scenario. Go back to when your grandfather was a little boy and explain that people would be whizzing around on cycles, all sounds ok. Suggest that in 60 years time, people will routinely drive 2 tonne steel cages through the heart of our towns at 30mph, and he'll call you crazy.
Actually, this is an entirely safe bet, as my grandfather thought everyone was crazy. Then again, he died at 102, didn't have my dad until he was 40, and dad's long retired.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.