punkypossum
Donut Devil
- Location
- My own little planet...
Right, here is the report for those of you that wanted an update!
Well, I got to Paul Hewitt without getting lost (tada!), so I suppose at least it was a good start... After spending ages setting up the fitting rig so it matched everything on my current mountain bike (crank length, etc.), things carried on well for a bit, the first measurement he took I had actually got right - but then again, it was only the saddle height and he informed me most people tend to get that one correct. He was right, it went downhill from there!
The bars went down about an inch (oh how glad I was about my spacer stack, although it now looks totally stupid, with loads of spacers on top of the stem, steerer will have to be cut eventually if I get on with the new position). The reach, argh!!! I knew the bike felt a bit short, but it turned out the saddle had to be moved back on the rails by about 2cms and things got worse after that, the actual overall reach has now increased by about 6.5cm!!!! by moving the saddle back and putting on a longer stem with less of a rise and obviously lower down... That is scarily wrong!!!! Only ridden the bike for the 5 miles home, so can't report how it will feel on a longer ride, but it was fine for that distance and actually felt really comfy, especially with the bars lower down although the more stretched out position will take some getting used to.
He also measured me up for a road bike, so I know what to look out for when choosing one (chances of me being able to afford one of his custom builds are slim). Turns out that, as I have a short body and arms, but long legs, I will never be able to have a bike with that cool looking position where the saddle is miles higher than the bars, because my kangaroo arms won't be able to cope with a steep drop, so saddle and bars will end up approximately the same height with the bars only slightly lower - which makes me even more determined to go for a sloping frame, as the tiny bit of seatpost would otherwise look totally stupid... (and I really like that bum in the sky look, sniff!) I also apparently need a high head tube (something like 183 normal, 203 integrated) - he did explain why and what that meant, but my brain had started to go fuzzy with numbers by this point, so I have no idea apart from the fact it seems to rule out Ribble bikes) and a top tube of 565mm...which is apparently quite short as I need a rather large frame... it was all very confusing... The only saving grace is that apparently I don't need a shallow seattube angle, but a fairly standard 73-74 degrees... This is apparently a good thing, but I can't for the life of me remember why...
We were in there for over 2 hours, by the end of it, I had numbers coming out of both ears and a lot of it had definitely started going over my head - poor puddleglum had come along and looked as if she had lost the will to live by then. However, it was a really good experience, he was dead helpful, I learnt loads and some of his points about people getting to fixated on frame size rather than position were really interesting! And it was scary how wrong everything on my bike was without me even noticing!!!!
Anyway, if this works, then it was definitely worth doing, value for money and money worth spending (especially if I ever manage to afford one of his bikes and get the money back). He also said if I did want to buy one from him, they would remeasure me again free of charge to make sure everything is right.
So, that was my experience for those of you who are considering it - just need to get used to my new look bike now, it looks really oddly shaped at the moment compared to the previous look!!!
Edit: Sorry for the long post, only just realised how endless it is!!!
Well, I got to Paul Hewitt without getting lost (tada!), so I suppose at least it was a good start... After spending ages setting up the fitting rig so it matched everything on my current mountain bike (crank length, etc.), things carried on well for a bit, the first measurement he took I had actually got right - but then again, it was only the saddle height and he informed me most people tend to get that one correct. He was right, it went downhill from there!
The bars went down about an inch (oh how glad I was about my spacer stack, although it now looks totally stupid, with loads of spacers on top of the stem, steerer will have to be cut eventually if I get on with the new position). The reach, argh!!! I knew the bike felt a bit short, but it turned out the saddle had to be moved back on the rails by about 2cms and things got worse after that, the actual overall reach has now increased by about 6.5cm!!!! by moving the saddle back and putting on a longer stem with less of a rise and obviously lower down... That is scarily wrong!!!! Only ridden the bike for the 5 miles home, so can't report how it will feel on a longer ride, but it was fine for that distance and actually felt really comfy, especially with the bars lower down although the more stretched out position will take some getting used to.
He also measured me up for a road bike, so I know what to look out for when choosing one (chances of me being able to afford one of his custom builds are slim). Turns out that, as I have a short body and arms, but long legs, I will never be able to have a bike with that cool looking position where the saddle is miles higher than the bars, because my kangaroo arms won't be able to cope with a steep drop, so saddle and bars will end up approximately the same height with the bars only slightly lower - which makes me even more determined to go for a sloping frame, as the tiny bit of seatpost would otherwise look totally stupid... (and I really like that bum in the sky look, sniff!) I also apparently need a high head tube (something like 183 normal, 203 integrated) - he did explain why and what that meant, but my brain had started to go fuzzy with numbers by this point, so I have no idea apart from the fact it seems to rule out Ribble bikes) and a top tube of 565mm...which is apparently quite short as I need a rather large frame... it was all very confusing... The only saving grace is that apparently I don't need a shallow seattube angle, but a fairly standard 73-74 degrees... This is apparently a good thing, but I can't for the life of me remember why...
We were in there for over 2 hours, by the end of it, I had numbers coming out of both ears and a lot of it had definitely started going over my head - poor puddleglum had come along and looked as if she had lost the will to live by then. However, it was a really good experience, he was dead helpful, I learnt loads and some of his points about people getting to fixated on frame size rather than position were really interesting! And it was scary how wrong everything on my bike was without me even noticing!!!!
Anyway, if this works, then it was definitely worth doing, value for money and money worth spending (especially if I ever manage to afford one of his bikes and get the money back). He also said if I did want to buy one from him, they would remeasure me again free of charge to make sure everything is right.
So, that was my experience for those of you who are considering it - just need to get used to my new look bike now, it looks really oddly shaped at the moment compared to the previous look!!!
Edit: Sorry for the long post, only just realised how endless it is!!!