Longer rides and stopping

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Want to start doing longer rides at the weekend.

Would I find it easier to do say 40 miles non-stop or 60 miles stopping to eat mid-way?
 
only you can answer that.
 

tyred

Squire
Location
Ireland
I have never found it a problem to stop and then get back on to the bike but I guess everyone is different. I have often fitted in a few miles of hillwalking in the middle of a ride.

At this time of year, it's worth carrying a fleece top or something if you intend to be stopped outside for any length of time as I feel I very quickly cool down.
 
OP
OP
M

Markymark

Guest
That'll be the 5 course lunch, and a bottle of bubbly. Not to mention the Port afterwards.
A port before sunset, I'm not a barbarian! It would be a whisky after lunch.

I guess 'find easier' was vague, I would mean which should I start aiming for to build up stamina or is it simply a case of what suits me?

I've done 45 miles non-stop before on my hybrid - bit hilly and bit windy but I was knackered at the end of it!!
 

Sittingduck

Legendary Member
Location
Somewhere flat
If you want to build stamina, I would just try and get out and get the riding time put it. If you feel like a break then have one. Equally, I see no real reason why you couldn't fuel on the move. Drinking is fairly easy but eating just needs a bit of practice and selecting and storing the appropriate foods.

After a while you will figure out what works best for you :smile:
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
Training rides = no stopping.

Riding in such a way with your main goal being to increase your stamina sounds to me like a training ride, i.e. no stopping.
 

Herzog

Swinglish Mountain Goat
As Rob3rt wrote, if it's training ride I don't stop. If it's sightseeing etc., then there are usually loads of stops for photos, food...

However, these days I have very little time for the latter.
 

Kins

Über Member
Unless your an elite sports person, If you did two 15 miles, with a 10 minute break, of the same intensity as one 30 miles it would make next to no difference, fitness wise, having that break. There is a university study website somewhere that shows the difference with breaks of continuous aerobic exercise (various not just cycling and studies all sorts of people from elite to people just starting) that shows what length of break actually effects the aerobic benefits. Its negligible under 30 minutes if I remember it correctly.
 
Top Bottom