Fiona N
Veteran
Well, not actually but potentially.
I never thought I complain about a cyclist's light but a few mornings ago I drove the car (rare occurrence), leaving home before dawn. On an unlit country road, I saw a very intense, flashing light and assumed I was seeing a car halogen head light through a hedge or fencing causing it to 'flash' - but it was too regular. Eventually, the cyclist got close enough that my dipped headlights illuminated him/her. I was tempted to put my lights to full beam as the rapid flashing of the single LED-type light was destroying my vision (as obviously I couldn't NOT look in it's direction as it was directly ahead of me along the road I was driving) in a way that a fixed light wouldn't have. And I wonder how much good it was doing the cyclist in terms or seeing where he was going.
The flashing was pretty rapid (ca. 5 Hz) and I can imagine it causing real problems for some drivers. I certainly think it's irresponsibly anti-driver. I've complained long and often about car drivers not dipping their lights (either at all or soon enough) when approaching a cyclist but this cycle light seems to be deliberately aimed at the drivers more like a 'weapon' that something for illuminating the road ahead and being seen by - the fixed light alone would have been just as good in the latter and better at the former purpose. I also think that it will be likely to cause a combative response from the sort of generally inconsiderate drivers (I'm thinking BWMs, big flash SUVs etc. here) who will make a point of putting their lights on fullbeam - and let's admit it - this bike light was good but it wasn't comparable to full beam on a Rangerover or a big BMW coming at you.
So do you use your bike lights like a weapon or are you just happy to be seen (and light the road ahead)?
I never thought I complain about a cyclist's light but a few mornings ago I drove the car (rare occurrence), leaving home before dawn. On an unlit country road, I saw a very intense, flashing light and assumed I was seeing a car halogen head light through a hedge or fencing causing it to 'flash' - but it was too regular. Eventually, the cyclist got close enough that my dipped headlights illuminated him/her. I was tempted to put my lights to full beam as the rapid flashing of the single LED-type light was destroying my vision (as obviously I couldn't NOT look in it's direction as it was directly ahead of me along the road I was driving) in a way that a fixed light wouldn't have. And I wonder how much good it was doing the cyclist in terms or seeing where he was going.
The flashing was pretty rapid (ca. 5 Hz) and I can imagine it causing real problems for some drivers. I certainly think it's irresponsibly anti-driver. I've complained long and often about car drivers not dipping their lights (either at all or soon enough) when approaching a cyclist but this cycle light seems to be deliberately aimed at the drivers more like a 'weapon' that something for illuminating the road ahead and being seen by - the fixed light alone would have been just as good in the latter and better at the former purpose. I also think that it will be likely to cause a combative response from the sort of generally inconsiderate drivers (I'm thinking BWMs, big flash SUVs etc. here) who will make a point of putting their lights on fullbeam - and let's admit it - this bike light was good but it wasn't comparable to full beam on a Rangerover or a big BMW coming at you.
So do you use your bike lights like a weapon or are you just happy to be seen (and light the road ahead)?