Hi. First post here and as a complete novice who doesn't know exactly what I want to do, I thought I'd post this as I find forums a great source of knowledge from, mostly, friendly people.
I have not owned a bike for several years. I am in my 40s and my main exercise is skiing once a year. I am generally healthy and not massively unfit but I thought that getting a bike would be a good way to build up my leg muscles and have a bit of fun riding with friends who have a bike. I ski with people who cycle and they are all fitter than me, so I figured it was a good way to get healthy.
I would be unlikely to commute and would mostly ride on tracks/bike trails, but nothing steep and messy; I see myself as being a bit of a fair weather rider. I have done a lot of reading over the past couple of weeks and popped into Evans yesterday for a quote for a bike and helmet etc.
From my reading, I have decided on a Pinnacle Lithium 3 or 4 bike as what seems to be a good compromise between roads and tracks. Now I've waffled on a bit, I have a query on gearing, as I have been unable to test ride the two bikes to compare them owing to them not being in stock.
At the top end, the Lithium 4 has a gear ratio of 4:1 and the Lithium 3 has a ratio of 3.5:1. I believe this means the Lithium 4 will go faster for the same amount of effort, but given that I am very much in the beginner category and I want to get a bike for general fun and fitness, would I really notice/miss that much difference in top end gearing between the Lithium 3 and the Lithium 4, or am I asking a "How long is a piece of string" question? The difference in price is around £100, and I am wondering whether it is worth that.
At the bottom end, the gear ratio for the Lithium 4 is 0.6475 and the Lithium 3 is 0.6875, although I do not see the differential in these as being so important, as I understand they are both quite low and good for hills. I am inclined to go for the Lithium 3 but any thoughts would be welcome.
I have not owned a bike for several years. I am in my 40s and my main exercise is skiing once a year. I am generally healthy and not massively unfit but I thought that getting a bike would be a good way to build up my leg muscles and have a bit of fun riding with friends who have a bike. I ski with people who cycle and they are all fitter than me, so I figured it was a good way to get healthy.
I would be unlikely to commute and would mostly ride on tracks/bike trails, but nothing steep and messy; I see myself as being a bit of a fair weather rider. I have done a lot of reading over the past couple of weeks and popped into Evans yesterday for a quote for a bike and helmet etc.
From my reading, I have decided on a Pinnacle Lithium 3 or 4 bike as what seems to be a good compromise between roads and tracks. Now I've waffled on a bit, I have a query on gearing, as I have been unable to test ride the two bikes to compare them owing to them not being in stock.
At the top end, the Lithium 4 has a gear ratio of 4:1 and the Lithium 3 has a ratio of 3.5:1. I believe this means the Lithium 4 will go faster for the same amount of effort, but given that I am very much in the beginner category and I want to get a bike for general fun and fitness, would I really notice/miss that much difference in top end gearing between the Lithium 3 and the Lithium 4, or am I asking a "How long is a piece of string" question? The difference in price is around £100, and I am wondering whether it is worth that.
At the bottom end, the gear ratio for the Lithium 4 is 0.6475 and the Lithium 3 is 0.6875, although I do not see the differential in these as being so important, as I understand they are both quite low and good for hills. I am inclined to go for the Lithium 3 but any thoughts would be welcome.