Sam Wardill
New Member
I took my wife's Ridgeback Cyclone in for its first paid for service after 9 months. I took it back to the shop that sold it to us. They told me that it needed a new chain and chainset. I declined. I don't think a bike should need a new chainset after 9 months.
It ocurred to me that under the UK Sale Of Goods Act I may be able to claim that, if the bike needs such a significant replacement after such a short time, it was not of merchantable quality when sold. When I said that I did not want to be replacing the chain and chainset every 9 months the mechanic stated that the replacement chainset that he would fit would be of better quality and would last longer (therefore indicating that the initially fitted chainset was sub-standard). Has anyone ever tested this?
It ocurred to me that under the UK Sale Of Goods Act I may be able to claim that, if the bike needs such a significant replacement after such a short time, it was not of merchantable quality when sold. When I said that I did not want to be replacing the chain and chainset every 9 months the mechanic stated that the replacement chainset that he would fit would be of better quality and would last longer (therefore indicating that the initially fitted chainset was sub-standard). Has anyone ever tested this?