I take your point. It wasn't a criticism, but, rather, an observation.
To go back a bit - maybe my post wasn't as well laid out as it might be. It's really that I think culture bears on different groups in different ways. In London, as you may know, we have a particular problem with construction traffic, a problem that is being addressed in a way by the LCC. Having said that....there's no gainsaying that the consideration shown by drivers to cyclists has soared upward in the last thirty years, which, if I'm any judge, hasn't happened in other parts of the UK - I referred to Scotland, but I might equally have mentioned Berkshire.
So my point is that a general campaign, however well thought out, relies on political will, and, equally, may be too general. TfL are currently running a campaign targetted at youngsters who cross roads while on their mobiles. LCC has recently targeted Addison Lee. My thought is that the 'car as weapon' thing is simultaneously addressing the vast majority of drivers who would not conceive of their car as being a weapon, and, equally, the small minority who rather like the idea. It might be that it would help in the way the drink-driving campaigns inspired a cultural shift, but my thought is that it wouldn't connect sufficiently with the majority - and have no beneficial effect on the minority. You'd be better off shooting Clarkson (in a purely hypothetical way, of course) and crushing a few X5s, which would be both pleasurable and immediately instructive, in that it would, in a simple way, ask people to distinguish themselves from Clarkson and the X5istes.