Hi all,
I have a Specialized Secteur 2010, which I use for commuting in London and the odd longer bike ride. I also have (don't ask how) a Giant Defy 3, which I use for long rides (100km +) in the south of France. If you didn't know it already, these bikes are - on paper - nearly identical: aluminium frames, carbon forks, neither has any suspension/absorbers. Both are (to within 5mm) the same size and I can't see any noticeable differences in geometry.
But the Giant, for me, is a much better bike, and I can't explain why! Can you?
I use the same saddle on both. The Shimano Sora + FSA chainrings on the Giant are better than the Shimano 2300 set on the Secteur, but ignoring that, the frame on the Giant feels so much more secure and responsive than the Specialized. How can this be?
I'm curious to know because when the time comes to upgrade, I want to know how to express what I like! Or is it the case of small differences adding up to a big change in feel?
Jamie
I have a Specialized Secteur 2010, which I use for commuting in London and the odd longer bike ride. I also have (don't ask how) a Giant Defy 3, which I use for long rides (100km +) in the south of France. If you didn't know it already, these bikes are - on paper - nearly identical: aluminium frames, carbon forks, neither has any suspension/absorbers. Both are (to within 5mm) the same size and I can't see any noticeable differences in geometry.
But the Giant, for me, is a much better bike, and I can't explain why! Can you?
I use the same saddle on both. The Shimano Sora + FSA chainrings on the Giant are better than the Shimano 2300 set on the Secteur, but ignoring that, the frame on the Giant feels so much more secure and responsive than the Specialized. How can this be?
I'm curious to know because when the time comes to upgrade, I want to know how to express what I like! Or is it the case of small differences adding up to a big change in feel?
Jamie