GrumpyGregry
Here for rides.
... not too shabby. There are too many bikes on too narrow cycle paths in places, and sometimes the path just stops and spits you onto the road, and don't get me started on turning left at which point I become a third-class person, but the mini traffic lights for cycles are cool, and the sensors that pick you up and change the big lights are excellent, and the drivers are on the look out for cyclists so as long as you behave predictably (hard for a UK cyclist to do in their eyes - it takes some learning to ride cph style) you get on fine.
But I can't see how the infrastructure could be built in London. Honestly I can't. All but a few roads are too narrow.
Just tax the bluddy cars off the roads and ban the tipper trucks that seem to kill so many cyclists and you'd be well on the way to Copenhagenising London.
Malmo is pretty cool to, bike wise. "No ridiculous car journeys" (of less than 5km.) But no one in UK would ever vote for a city council with that as a slogan whereas in Sweden...
Stockholm is just generally the coolest place on earth, and not just from a cycling perspective.
But I can't see how the infrastructure could be built in London. Honestly I can't. All but a few roads are too narrow.
Just tax the bluddy cars off the roads and ban the tipper trucks that seem to kill so many cyclists and you'd be well on the way to Copenhagenising London.
Malmo is pretty cool to, bike wise. "No ridiculous car journeys" (of less than 5km.) But no one in UK would ever vote for a city council with that as a slogan whereas in Sweden...
Stockholm is just generally the coolest place on earth, and not just from a cycling perspective.