Careless cyclist fined in rare prosecution

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
From today's Cambridge News:

Careless cyclist fined in rare prosecution

A student who left a motorcyclist with a broken collar bone has been found guilty of careless cycling.The unusual charge was brought against the Clare College student after he caused a crash on Queen’s Road while cycling wearing headphones.

Cambridge Magistrates’ Court heard how Jin-Hyung Lee was travelling in the same direction as the motorcyclist, who was performing an overtaking manoeuvre when Lee suddenly turned right across the road.

His thoughtless move put him directly in the way of the overtaking vehicle which collided with him.

Details of the charge said: “Without warning and without looking the cyclist then turned right into the path of the motorcyclist, colliding and causing them to lose control and be unseated from his machine. The witness suffered a broken collar bone which was broken in two places.”

Magistrates were told it was a bright clear day when the accident happened on March 13 and that the road was not unusually busy.

The 19-year-old undergraduate lives in Memorial Court, off Queen’s Road, close to where the accident happened. He was fined £200, ordered to pay £300 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Pc Stuart Appleton, the prosecuting officer, said: “This is a rare charge. I have been in the police force for eight years and never come across it before.

“The cyclist was wearing iPod speakers which we think had a big part to play in the accident as he would not have been able to hear the traffic.

“Given the seriousness of the accident and how badly the victim was hurt, we felt it necessary to prosecute in this case.

“If cyclists are going to wear headphones we advise them to keep the volume at a sensible level and take extra care on the roads.”

Jim Chisholm, liaison officer for Cambridge Cycling Campaign, said cyclists have a responsibility to ride in a safe and considerate manner.

He said: “At this time of year there are lots of people coming to Cambridge who have learnt to ride a bicycle but have never ridden on busy roads.

“People who cycle should ensure they have the skills to ride on the road and students are old enough for that to be their own responsibility.”

A Cambridge University spokesman said: “The college gives a health and safety talk to students at the beginning of term and issues free bike lights and crash helmets if needed.”

Clare College did not wish to comment on the incident.

 

BSRU

A Human Being
Location
Swindon
I think a fair punishment, although the part about the iPod seems irrelevant if the cyclist had been looking back often enough especially just before any manoeuvre.
 

bricksmasher

Well-Known Member
Location
Cambridge
I agree, personally cant blam the ipods

But, i personally dont cycle with and ipod on, as i just automatically feel less aware , so prefer cycling with no music
 

Moss

Guest
A Foreign student, unaware of UK highway cycling rules, and highway codes. Cambridge is also the bicycle theft capital for the UK. My daughter had her Mum's Raleigh Lenton - step through Reynolds 531, from the early 1950's stolen while she was a student at Cambridge. Bike was secured with two locks.
 

yello

Guest
Fair enough to prosecute imho, sounds a considered course of action. Agreed also that the ipod thing is a red herring (though I note the comment about volume). The real mistake was in not looking before turning.
 
It seems disproportionate to me. Drivers get away with manouvers like that all the time. I'm inclined to think that this prosecution was driven by student-ism, cyclist-ism 'sending a strong message' bollox and, possibly, racism. 'Foreign students coming over here knocking over our motorcyclists....'
 

gb155

Fan Boy No More.
Location
Manchester-Ish
A Foreign student, unaware of UK highway cycling rules, and highway codes. Cambridge is also the bicycle theft capital for the UK. My daughter had her Mum's Raleigh Lenton - step through Reynolds 531, from the early 1950's stolen while she was a student at Cambridge. Bike was secured with two locks.


I don't think it's down to the uk road laws - more like not paying attention on a road - regardless of the country
 
Seems fair enough, Mp3 player may have contributed to not hearing the traffic but its no substitution for actually looking, which he didn't. Idiot.
 

Sheffield_Tiger

Legendary Member
No complaints here but I can't help wondering how many cyclists have been left with broken collarbones and the driver not prosecuted?
 

teletext45

Senior Member
I've recently started commuting to college everyday- a trip down a very busy road into the city centre. After commuting i've realised how bad alot of cyclists actually are.

I'm regularly following cyclists who change lanes and don't even look over their shoulders, i've even been down streets and theres somone cycling the wrong way down a road because they want to get down onto the pavement.

Alot of cyclists get a bad name and it's caused by cyclists who just have no idea how to cycle safely on a busy main road.

Admittedly it was only when i started taking cycling seriously that i really developed my road awareness but i think common sense is seriously lacking in alot of cyclists.

andy
 

4F

Active member of Helmets Are Sh*t Lobby
Location
Suffolk.
Seems fair enough to me, cue the wrath of the "I wear headphones but they don't hinder my hearing" posse.

Muppets :tongue:
 

Clive Atton

Über Member
It seems disproportionate to me. Drivers get away with manouvers like that all the time. I'm inclined to think that this prosecution was driven by student-ism, cyclist-ism 'sending a strong message' bollox and, possibly, racism. 'Foreign students coming over here knocking over our motorcyclists....'

So if you'd been cycling down the road, been wiped out by another vehicle (be it a cycle, motorcycle, car, van, lorry etc) and left with a broken collar-bone etc you would have been satisfied with no prosecution or a token £10 fine? I don't think drivers get away with causing injuries like that 'all the time'.
 

snailracer

Über Member
RE headphones, I wouldn’t have thought the motorcyclist could hear much either, and those white iPod headphones are a bit of a giveaway that the cyclist had chosen to render his ears no less useless than those of any motorist.

Perhaps a headphone-wearing cyclist would be legally better-covered if they wore really big, obvious headphones so overtaking vehicles can't claim the cyclist should have heard them coming?

Relying on hearing is risky because some vehicles cannot easily be heard - especially if there is other traffic about or the wind is rushing in your ears - so the only foolproof method is to look around.

Even though I don't ride with headphones myself, I don't think wearing them really affects safety - whether or not you can hear something behind you, you would still have to look to guarantee there isn't a "silent" vehicle about to overtake. It could even be argued that wearing headphones is safer, because you would then never pull out without looking - you avoid the situation where the ears lull you into a false sense of security.
 
Top Bottom