Brandane
Legendary Member
- Location
- Costa Clyde
I have a 6 year old Trek 6500 which WAS fitted with Manitou Axel suspension forks. I found them to be heavy, and as I mostly use the MTB for forestry tracks rather than what it was really intended for, the suspension forks are also unnecessary (apart from the occasional visit to the 7Stanes centres, for which the forks will be swapped over again).
I decided to replace the standard fork with a carbon one, from carboncycles .
Having now fitted it, I am really pleased with the result. It looks smart, performs well and has shed about a kilo from the weight of the bike. Only thing I am concerned about is the flex when braking! The bike is fitted with Shimano Deore disc brakes with a 160mm rotor. The amount of flex in the fork when braking is quite alarming, and obviously means the front brake is not as efficient as it was before. That doesn't bother me too much, but I am slightly worried about how much flex the fork can take before it breaks. I am assuming that the manufacturers will know what they are doing, and it will have been tested to much higher limits than I am ever likely to put on it; or am I placing too much trust in them?
I decided to replace the standard fork with a carbon one, from carboncycles .
Having now fitted it, I am really pleased with the result. It looks smart, performs well and has shed about a kilo from the weight of the bike. Only thing I am concerned about is the flex when braking! The bike is fitted with Shimano Deore disc brakes with a 160mm rotor. The amount of flex in the fork when braking is quite alarming, and obviously means the front brake is not as efficient as it was before. That doesn't bother me too much, but I am slightly worried about how much flex the fork can take before it breaks. I am assuming that the manufacturers will know what they are doing, and it will have been tested to much higher limits than I am ever likely to put on it; or am I placing too much trust in them?