Buses - advice needed

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

d87francis

Well-Known Member
Location
Oxford
Sorry for the ramble but here goes - I'm growing increasingly worried about the driving behaviour of a large percentage of bus drivers in central Oxford.

For those of you who have not visited Oxford we have a very large number of buses and cyclists in the city centre with many narrow roads. Whilst I empathise massively with drivers of large vehicles in central Oxford as I encounter almost daily very poor cycling such as undertaking buses, and because of the road layout and number of cyclists, to overtake safely becomes very hard; I feel that many bus drivers have become complacent about overtaking cyclists with very little space. Let me post a screenshot from google street view as an example:
oxhigh.jpg

There is nearly always traffic queuing in the centre lane to turn right and also a traffic island a few hundred yards up so any bus wishing to overtake is forced to stay in the lane, resulting in what most bus drivers seem to do, is overtake very closely but slowly. Whilst I'm not comfortable with this it seems that this is what they have been told to do, as having complained a couple of times about this sort of overtake (once when I was a passenger on a bus to the driver) they don't see anything wrong with it.

I have however, on a few occaisions been overtaken very closely at some considerable speed by buses, to which I have complained, resulting in two separate drivers being sent on a course and another having a disciplinary. Two of these incidents occured on Headington Hill where although there are mandatory solid white line cycle lanes on either side there are lamposts in the lane on one side and if two buses pass each other whilst going past you there is little space.

My worry is that because the bus companies seem alright with drivers overtaking very closely albeit slowly, drivers are becoming complacent and increasing the speed of these overtakes. I'm involved with some local cycling campaign groups and I think that there need to be some infrastructure changes, in particular the removal of cycle lanes where it is too narrow such as in the picture above; as I feel that they also create a false sense of security for the cyclist and vehicle alike, that neither has done any wrong so long as they have stuck to their lane - leading to dangerous undertakes by cyclists and more dangerously close overtakes by cars and buses. On other narrow roads such as Cowley road they have already removed the cycle lanes and painted large bikes in the middle of the road to encourage cyclists to take a primary position and stop themselves being squeezed.

I'm interested in opinions as to how else I can stop this practice of close overtakes? I will continue to complain about the fast ones however, I don't know what I can do to put a stop to the others? Luckily most of the buses are quite modern and have cameras all over them, however, I don't have the time to continually complain to the companies and police as I witness it happen at least once or twice a day. Plus if I were to complain or report it to that level I would soon be ignored as a nutter.

What is your consensus on this practice as presumably they are just being pragmatic in that if they waited until there was space to overtake the buses would never get anywhere on time? However, I would call myself a very experienced cyclist and the close slow overtakes still scare me and many years ago were a strong factor in influencing me not to cycle, as well as other friends who won't ride because they feel it is too dangerous, something I feel is awful.

Sadly the other thing that highly annoys me is that where the roads are wide enough and the council have been good enough to put in mandatory solid white line cycle lanes they are full of parked cars. There is a section along St Clements I have yet to ride and not find a car parked in the cycle lane!
 

Mr Haematocrit

msg me on kik for android
I would call myself a very experienced cyclist and the close slow overtakes still scare me and many years ago were a strong factor in influencing me not to cycle, as well as other friends who won't ride because they feel it is too dangerous, something I feel is awful.

Although close slow overtakes are not enjoyable, they are part of being a cyclist in any major city imho.
The fact is Vehicles overtake because you place them in a position where they are able to do so however slowly and closely. On my commute I have to cross a bridge with a bend in the middle, vehicles try to squeeze dangerously past on it.. So I take prime position on this bridge and purposefully wobble the bike to make it look as if I am not in total control, as this makes motorists more nervous
I have had queues of traffic behind me while I cross the bridge but the simple truth is my safety is more important than the motorists progress. I never position myself on the road where an escape gap of at least another bike is available, position yourself so that motorists have to pass rather than squeeze past you slowly.
I believe you may need to cycle more defensively, confidently and with purpose as if you act scared out on the road and hug the curb and similar the motorist will beat you up imho and no amount of letter writing or complaining will change that.
 

Richard Mann

Well-Known Member
Location
Oxford
It's a difficult balance. You need both buses and bikes to make the city work.

However, most cyclists stick to secondary position and appreciate the comfort of a cycle lane, so getting rid of the cycle lanes isn't really a solution (quite the reverse). Maybe it makes the situation occasionally slightly worse as far as overtaking is concerned, but that's outweighed by the day-in-day-out comfort benefit.

The area in front of Magdalen: What's really needed is to get rid of the middle lane, and widen the pavements. That's difficult because of the volume of queuing in the morning peak (the centre lane is there to ensure the cars don't hold up the buses), but there's probably things that can be done to make it work. Going the other way, there's a tricky spot just by the refuge where buses tend to accelerate and swing a bit unnervingly. That needs to be fixed.

The lampposts on Headington Hill need to be moved into the verge. Just need to find the cash to do it.

St Clements - loading is legal all the way along there, on both sides (and explicitly marked as such, which makes it a bit hard to enforce the mandatory bike lanes). There needs to be proper loading bays somewhere.

I tend to go out of my way to be nice to bus drivers, and let them go first. I reckon if at least a few cyclists are courteous, bus drivers are less likely to see cyclists as the enemy. Both the main bus companies give special training to their drivers on bus/cycle interactions, and they're quite a bit better than they were a few years ago. Both companies follow up complaints pretty assiduously too, so it is worth complaining if you've got the details.

My best advice is join the campaigns, and help work through these issues. It'll take a while, but the will is probably there to get things fixed somehow, eventually.

Richard
 
OP
OP
d87francis

d87francis

Well-Known Member
Location
Oxford
I believe you may need to cycle more defensively, confidently and with purpose as if you act scared out on the road and hug the curb and similar the motorist will beat you up imho and no amount of letter writing or complaining will change that.
Thanks, I don't think I quite explained myself properly, I ride quite defensively and take primary on these locations and pinch points etc. It's more on the odd occasion it does happen the shock of seeing a bus suddenly that close to me scares me. What scares/worries me most is witnessing other cyclists being overtaken that closely. There is some outright dangerous cycling around Oxford, but then an awful lot more people that probably see nothing wrong with riding in secondary the whole time or going up the inside of a bus at a junction.

May I infer from your reply that you think it would be more beneficial for cyclists to be more proactive in their positioning and not letting it happen? This is mainly the reason why I support the removal of cycle lanes in there narrow areas to promote a primary position.
 

Mr Haematocrit

msg me on kik for android
May I infer from your reply that you think it would be more beneficial for cyclists to be more proactive in their positioning and not letting it happen? This is mainly the reason why I support the removal of cycle lanes in there narrow areas to promote a primary position.

Totally, I personally feel that cycle lanes by large are designed to get the cyclist out of the way of the motorist rather than to permit a safe route for the cyclist. They often are excessively narrow, have street lighting and bus stops in them to name but a few hazards.
The biggest issue I have with cycle lanes is that they prevent many drivers from considering cyclists, in a sense it prevents them from being road users.. Pedestrians have their space on the pavements, cyclists have their lane which makes motorists feel you are invading their space if you leave the cycle lane.
We need to work towards sharing the space on the roads more effectively IMHO, quite how to do this I'm not really sure.
 
OP
OP
d87francis

d87francis

Well-Known Member
Location
Oxford
My best advice is join the campaigns, and help work through these issues. It'll take a while, but the will is probably there to get things fixed somehow, eventually.
Thanks Richard, I do intend to join Cyclox as I'm part of the Headington Cycle Group and Simon has even given me a membership form.

I'm in complete agreement that it's a difficult balance, as I really value the City's bus services and most of the drivers are exemplary in their driving. I too like to let the buses go first and see little point in advancing to an ASL when you can just take a strong primary position behind them. I am courteous to bus drivers as I am to all road users and pedestrians. I do not mean to stereotype or wage war against the buses but I have noticed a trend or a reasonable percentage of buses overtaking dangerously. I have only lived in Oxford since 2005 so I cannot comment on how bus drivers used to behave, but maybe this is a gradual decline since then. Plus, no matter how safe or comfortable you feel with a bus driving slowly but closely past you it has to have a negative effect on the number of people cycling, as perception of road safety has to be an influencing factor when people choose whether to cycle.

I was not aware of the loading rights along St Clements but have since spotted them on Google Street view, thanks that would explain a few things. I would have thought that the loading only counts in the small bits of cycle lane that aren't solid white line? I really have no idea which trumps the other but my understanding was the only reason a vehicle could have to enter a mandatory cycle lane was to move out the way to an emergency services vehicle.

Whilst I support what you say about the benefit of cycle lanes, if the council are unable to make the cycle lane outside of Magdalen college any wider, such as by removing the middle lane and refuge, I think something needs to be done to promote taking a primary position on this section as I regularly see overtakes that make me cringe along here. Despite having my reservations as to the benefits of removing cycle lanes on long sections of road and promoting shared use such as Cowley road, I still think there are many instances where a bit of cycle lane has been put in without proper risk assesments/consultation/listening to consultation.

Thanks for your advice and hopefully I shall catch up with you at a Cyclox meeting.
 

Scruffmonster

Über Member
Location
London/Kent
As a mass and probably unfair, mass sweeping generalisation, London bus drivers are the worst drivers on the road, all seem to be of below average intelligence, are surly, and entrusted with driving many tons of metal around. It's barmy.

I also think any bus driver that tries to overtake another bus and cannot complete the manoeuvre before the other bus indicates to pull away should be shot.

I really like buses too.
 

Scruffmonster

Über Member
Location
London/Kent
How do you know exactly when a bus is going to indicate to pull away?

It does that just after everyone waiting to get on or off has done so.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
That bike lane on the approach to Longwall and the High was probably built in response to one of what always used to be a depressingly large number of people knocked off bikes as they turned right, probably about the same time as the High was stripped of its status as Oxford's main East-West thoroughfare. There was a single fatality there a year or two before that, which probably contributed.

Unless things have changed an awful lot in 20 years, Oxford's cyclists have never taken much notice of bike lane markings. Bus drivers have always been a mix of the competent and the less competent, and some bus drivers have always driven rather more quickly than is ideal. On the other hand, you've got a critical mass of cyclists wanting to get places in a hurry, so the drivers are all very used to sharing the road.

The best way to promote safe cycling is simply to do it, and encourage others to do it. If you want to something slightly more formal, your best bet is probably via a university or student body - you can completely change the culture of the place within three years, since a very large proportion of the city's cyclists will be students.
 

lulubel

Über Member
Location
Malaga, Spain
It does that just after everyone waiting to get on or off has done so.

Not necessarily. You can have at least 2 people already on the bus, but who haven't got their tickets yet, so you can't assume the bus is going to pull away as soon as the last person moves onto the step. Bus drivers are also supposed to wait until all the passengers have sat down, or at least are holding on safely, before they pull away (although I know not all do this). Also, the driver may pause to have a drink, check his route card, return a call from the depot, etc, before he's ready to pull away. Or he may be simply running a bit early and have to "wait his time" at the stop.

Besides all that, there's no obligation on the part of any road user to wait behind a vehicle because it might be about to signal to pull out. An indicator is a signal of intention, and if there's another vehicle already passing you when you put your indicator on, you wait for it to complete the manouevre before you move. Simple.
 

Scruffmonster

Über Member
Location
London/Kent
Not necessarily. You can have at least 2 people already on the bus, but who haven't got their tickets yet, so you can't assume the bus is going to pull away as soon as the last person moves onto the step. Bus drivers are also supposed to wait until all the passengers have sat down, or at least are holding on safely, before they pull away (although I know not all do this). Also, the driver may pause to have a drink, check his route card, return a call from the depot, etc, before he's ready to pull away. Or he may be simply running a bit early and have to "wait his time" at the stop.

Besides all that, there's no obligation on the part of any road user to wait behind a vehicle because it might be about to signal to pull out. An indicator is a signal of intention, and if there's another vehicle already passing you when you put your indicator on, you wait for it to complete the manouevre before you move. Simple.

Buses overtaking buses on narrow streets, or, more to the point, Buses FAILING to overtake buses on narrow streets serves nobody's interests.

Standard bus driver behavior is:

- Pull nose into traffic, blocking two lanes.
- Realise it's not possible to complete the maneouvre
- Wait until the bus in front pulls away
- Pull in behind

It's rare that you see a bus overtake another from a standstill, successfully. Stop them doing it.
 

lulubel

Über Member
Location
Malaga, Spain
Stop them doing it.

You really need to move away from this "them and us" attitude. If everyone thought of all road users as "we" there wouldn't be any problems or conflict.

You're also wrong. I've driven buses in London, and the kind of behaviour you describe is associated with a small minority of drivers.
 

Scruffmonster

Über Member
Location
London/Kent
You really need to move away from this "them and us" attitude. If everyone thought of all road users as "we" there wouldn't be any problems or conflict.

You're also wrong. I've driven buses in London, and the kind of behaviour you describe is associated with a small minority of drivers.

It's not them and us. I do of course know that there are good and bad bus drivers, I've shared a cab with a fabulous Adison Lee driver, many black cab drivers are courteous, White Van men are actually pretty decent and cyclists do make errors... but groups will get an image based on percentages of good/bad behaviour.

Many many bus drivers (I wont per a percentage on it) are very bad though. Buses are a wonderful method of transport. The drivers could go a long way if they realised that they were not car drivers in a bigger vehicle. 60ish people on a bus should be driven smoothly. No mass acceleration, no need for overtaking buses to save seconds, and on a smaller note, at least a smile/nod/hello to at least every tenth traveller.

All these comments are London specific of course.
 

Bill-H

slow and steady
Location
exmouth
[QUOTEand on a smaller note, at least a smile/nod/hello to at least every tenth traveller.
][/QUOTE]
having been a bus driver in my distant pass i can assure you it is the most demoralising job i had at start of shift i would be cheerful after 8 or 12 hours of abuse i was a miserable old sod
 
Top Bottom