After many years, my bottom bracket became noisy and I replaced it. The model that was worn measured 127.5 mm, so that it is the length of the replacement that I fitted. The replacement is fine; only a slight amount of twiddling with the limit screws was necessary and the inner chain ring clears the chain stay by an adequate margin.
I think I will get a spare bb in case of future failure and I see that 127mm and the 127.5mm are common options - almost de facto standards. I can't imagine that a 127mm version on my bike, with a quarter of a millimetre length difference on each side, would make any performance difference, so I may well buy a 127mm version.
It prompts me to ask the question here : "why would 2 length options, so close together, be so commonly available?"
I think I will get a spare bb in case of future failure and I see that 127mm and the 127.5mm are common options - almost de facto standards. I can't imagine that a 127mm version on my bike, with a quarter of a millimetre length difference on each side, would make any performance difference, so I may well buy a 127mm version.
It prompts me to ask the question here : "why would 2 length options, so close together, be so commonly available?"