Andy in Sig
Vice President in Exile
- Location
- Sigmaringen, Germany
I thought about this after looking a Bonj's thread on hybrids in P & L. A lot of beginners come on here asking what sort of bike they should get and a common recommendation is indeed a hybrid which, as far as I can see, is a racing bike with flat handle bars.
It seems to me that a racing bike (irrespective of handle bar type) is at one extreme end of the design spectrum much as a fully suspended heavy duty downhill bike is at the other. Therefore what sort of bike should be recommended to the average beginner or somebody returning to cycling, assuming that they specifically don't want to take up racing?
My default setting is always a tourer as they are fast, are designed to carry paniers or loads (makes them perfect for shopping/utility) are comfortable (especially steel framed ones) and can happily be driven on woodland paths, canal towpaths etc. Then there are other "town" bikes (for want of a better term) which also come with mudguards racks etc.
Does this seem a reasonable point of view, i.e. that tourers are most likely to please most beginners, most of the time?
It seems to me that a racing bike (irrespective of handle bar type) is at one extreme end of the design spectrum much as a fully suspended heavy duty downhill bike is at the other. Therefore what sort of bike should be recommended to the average beginner or somebody returning to cycling, assuming that they specifically don't want to take up racing?
My default setting is always a tourer as they are fast, are designed to carry paniers or loads (makes them perfect for shopping/utility) are comfortable (especially steel framed ones) and can happily be driven on woodland paths, canal towpaths etc. Then there are other "town" bikes (for want of a better term) which also come with mudguards racks etc.
Does this seem a reasonable point of view, i.e. that tourers are most likely to please most beginners, most of the time?