He calls himself a "Senior Motoring Writer", so instead of calling on cyclists to earn respect he should be appealing to his own audience, ie motorists, to earn respect of other road users. The article is little more than a rallying call for his tribe to gang up on a minority group and to see themselves as the good guys on the road. If he wants to lecture to cyclists why has he not contributed to a cycling publication?
None of the examples he quotes are likely to result in the death of another party anyway. Is cycling on a pavement really more likely to kill than opening a car door in front of a cyclist? Are cars with defective lights any more likely to be stopped by police than cyclists? I don't think so, but that's not what the writer says. He even talks about road tax
I just think it's lazy journalism designed to cause friction among road user groups rather than improve road safety or encourage all cyclists to become law abiding citizens