An end to texting and driving?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

classic33

Leg End Member
Rocket scientist's answer to texting and driving
A Rocket scientist's new idea could put an end to texting while driving with the hope of saving lives in the process.

On May 8, 2008, Dave Sueper was driving to a business meeting when he was struck and killed by a distracted teenage driver who had run a red light. Scott Tibbitts, a chemical engineer and space entrepreneur who made motors for NASA, was the person Sueper was scheduled to meet that tragic morning, and he was deeply affected when he learned about the accident. Like Sueper, he was a father of two, and as an engineer he became fixated on finding a way to prevent another death from distracted driving.

"There has gotta be something that will fix this technically," Tibbitts said, "and this feeling — it just wouldn't let go." He had recently sold his space company, Starsys Research Corp., and was looking for a new professional challenge. He soon committed himself to finding a solution to the growing epidemic of texting while driving.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, mobile phones are involved in 1.6 million auto crashes each year that cause a half million injuries and take 6,000 lives. Texting while driving has replaced drinking and driving as the leading cause of teen vehicular death, responsible for 20 per cent of all teen highway fatalities in the U.S.

There have been several attempts to curb this disturbing trend, most often with the use of apps on phones that tap into GPS signals to detect when a mobile phone is traveling more than 15 kilometres per hour and disable distracting features on the phone. But these apps can easily be overruled by the driver, and they don't make a distinction between a person traveling by car, public bus, bike or any other transport over 15 kilometres per hour.

This was the mystery that Tibbitts and his team at the new company he founded, Katasi, set out to solve. Their answer is Groove, a small device that plugs into a port located under the steering wheel (found in most cars made after 1996) and connects the car to the Internet.

Once each driver of the vehicle is registered with Groove, within seconds of a drive starting, Groove figures out who the driver is and notifies the person's phone carrier, allowing it to block distractions before they reach the phone. Once the car is turned off, Groove again notifies the carrier, and all blocked messages come rolling in, so nothing is missed.

In order for Groove to work seamlessly, it relies heavily on the partnership with mobile phone carriers. Katasi is working actively with two U.S. carriers to deploy Groove in 2015, but this, according to Tibbitts, is not enough.

"Our goal is to have every carrier on board with Groove, providing the capability to limit distractions before they get to the phone when a subscriber is driving" he said.

When Diane Misgen, the widow of Dave Sueper, learned what Tibbitts had developed in response to her husband's death, she was both honoured and hopeful that Groove will make a huge difference. Misgen said, "It was so reassuring to me that this was going to save so many lives. And I think for my kids, it's also heartwarming to know that someone else who had nothing to do with our family took on that challenge in honour of their dad."

To know more about Groove and find out whether it is available to you, visit Katasi.
 

slowmotion

Quite dreadful
Location
lost somewhere
It's a laudable crusade. I'm terrified of texting drivers and I see them on every motorway journey drifting across lanes or on to the hard shoulder with sudden, erratic corrections. The problem with the solution that you describe is that young texting drivers don't drive state of the art cars. They drive bangers, like me.
 

Shut Up Legs

Down Under Member
But how many drivers would voluntarily register with Groove? I can't picture hordes of motorists queueing to sign up to this service :rolleyes:. Court cases could conceivably result in drivers being forced to register their phones with Groove, at which point a lot of them would just get other phones - there, annoying "problem" solved, as far as the driver's concerned.
 

summerdays

Cycling in the sun
Location
Bristol
Would the phone still be able to other things, some useful and some not? For example we use a phone as a sat nav, which is useful, but I've also seem them being used to entertain the driver when bored. I guess I would accept having to buy another sat nav if it would result in fewer deaths.
 

the_mikey

Legendary Member
Google already have a mobile interface for Android devices that restricts what can be done with the phone when it's synchronised with the car entertainment system, in return for this it allows for certain uses such as sat nav or audio pkayback/Spotify through the existing car entertainment system, and messaging services are restricted by the OS while synchronised with the car.

That said, it's only defeating a mobile phone, it can't prevent drivers from putting on make-up, Reading newspapers, tablets, or using laptops with Mobile data access, which just means people will move to the next device or service that circumvents the problem.
 

winjim

Smash the cistern
Sounds like a device that shifts the burden of responsibility onto the actual car.
 

winjim

Smash the cistern
Give them an automatic years ban. If they ain't on the road, they can't do it.
You need to catch them first. Maybe instead of blocking the phone, the device could simply detect when it's being used and automatically contact the DVLA to get their licence suspended. :smile:
 

bianchi1

Legendary Member
Location
malverns
The solution still does not adequately address the 'passenger' point. Why, if an individual is driving, can a passenger not use that drivers phone...answering calls, checking sat nav etc. I know a few couples that share a phone contract and would find this solution a problem.

I'm with @Drago...huge fine, long ban and massive insurance premiums.
 

Recycle

Über Member
Location
Caterham
You need to catch them first. Maybe instead of blocking the phone, the device could simply detect when it's being used and automatically contact the DVLA to get their licence suspended. :smile:
The DM misreported (surprise surprise) that mobiles would be checked after crashes:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-wheel-bid-cut-deaths-distracted-drivers.html
Turned out to be not true for all sorts of privacy reasons (which doesn't seem to stop GCHQ).
IMO when they test for alcohol they should also check mobile phones.

* Health warning: It is strongly advised that you wash your eyes out with industrial detergent after reading the Daily Mail.
 

Ganymede

Veteran
Location
Rural Kent
Gosh yes, what's the Ebola crisis? I've not heard about that at all...

Seems to me that this endeavour, while praiseworthy, is very complex for the size of the problem. All the phone operators would have to be willing to do the switching on and off, which would presumably be triggered even if a person took a short hop in the car, which could be several times a day. Although the problem is far too widespread - I mean, it's not like drink driving, where you could safely guess that most people never do it - I think it would be tricky to get the massive amount of collaboration that this would require. And then legislation, otherwise it would simply not be in every car.
 
Top Bottom