gaijintendo
Veteran
- Location
- Scotchland
GlasgowCyclist linked to the excellent article by Martin Porter in the fevered court case thread.
https://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/the-alliston-mis-trial.html?m=1
It made reference to the 635 mm seat height The Pedal Cycle (Construction and Use) Regulations 1983 at the seventh section.
I assume there is an assumption that this means kids are allowed to brake with their brand new Clark's shoes (I should never have let her wear them to nursery).
Is that basically the logic? Presumably there were recumbent bikes in 1983?
https://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/the-alliston-mis-trial.html?m=1
It made reference to the 635 mm seat height The Pedal Cycle (Construction and Use) Regulations 1983 at the seventh section.
I assume there is an assumption that this means kids are allowed to brake with their brand new Clark's shoes (I should never have let her wear them to nursery).
Is that basically the logic? Presumably there were recumbent bikes in 1983?